2011
DOI: 10.3945/ajcn.111.017921
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of mass spectrometry fingerprinting to identify urinary metabolites after consumption of specific foods

Abstract: Background: The lack of robust biological markers of dietary exposure hinders the quantitative understanding of causal relations between diet and health. Objective: We aimed to develop an efficient procedure to discover metabolites in urine that may have future potential as biomarkers of acute exposure to foods of high public health importance. Design: Twenty-four participants were provided with a test breakfast in which the cereal component of a standardized breakfast was replaced by 1 of 4 foods of high publ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
126
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(129 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(103 reference statements)
3
126
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Non-targeted metabolite fingerprinting, using either NMR (17,19,21,28,29,31,33,35) or MS (20,(25)(26)(27) , and metabolite profiling using liquid chromatography MS (18,(22)(23)(24)28,30,32,34) have been used successfully for biomarker-lead discovery using urine samples from various study designs (Table 1). In acute food intervention studies (20,(22)(23)(24)(25)32) , participants were exposed to specific foods in known amounts and either postprandial urines sampled before the next meal or overnight or 24 h urines were collected. In other studies, participants were established on a specific diet for several days/weeks (17,19,21,28,33,35) or longer term (> 1 month) (18,31,34) before urine sampling.…”
Section: Dietary Exposure: Metabolite Fingerprinting: Ffq: Multivariamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Non-targeted metabolite fingerprinting, using either NMR (17,19,21,28,29,31,33,35) or MS (20,(25)(26)(27) , and metabolite profiling using liquid chromatography MS (18,(22)(23)(24)28,30,32,34) have been used successfully for biomarker-lead discovery using urine samples from various study designs (Table 1). In acute food intervention studies (20,(22)(23)(24)(25)32) , participants were exposed to specific foods in known amounts and either postprandial urines sampled before the next meal or overnight or 24 h urines were collected. In other studies, participants were established on a specific diet for several days/weeks (17,19,21,28,33,35) or longer term (> 1 month) (18,31,34) before urine sampling.…”
Section: Dietary Exposure: Metabolite Fingerprinting: Ffq: Multivariamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these studies, the analysis of diet diary or FFQ information allowed classification of individuals in terms of their frequency of consumption of specific diet constituents. In the present paper, we illustrate these approaches for biomarker discovery with particular reference to two studies carried out by the authors (20,(25)(26)(27) . The presence of substantial inter-and intra-individual variability in human metabolite profiles (36) provides a challenge for both biofluid sampling and subsequent data normalisation in metabolomics studies seeking information on habitual diet.…”
Section: Dietary Exposure: Metabolite Fingerprinting: Ffq: Multivariamentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As this was a less controlled intervention that included a wider selection of foods with varied amounts of intake and different preparation methods, it highlights the need for the validation of biomarkers in different subjects and study settings (27) . A number of red meat and fish biomarkers have been identified using this intervention approach (7,28,29) . Most recently, metabolomics has been applied to compare the different effects of meat and fish on the plasma metabolome (30) .…”
Section: Dietary Biomarker Discovery Using Intervention Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%