Use of membranes for the treatment and reuse of water from the pre-cooling system of chicken carcasses

Marchesi, Cristiane Michele; Paliga, Marshall; Oro, Carolina Elisa Demaman; Dallago, Rogério Marcos; Zin, Guilherme; Luccio, Marco Di; Oliveira, J. Vladimir; Tres, Marcus V.

doi:10.1080/09593330.2019.1624834

Cited by 11 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 25 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Hart et al [62] reported that the flux rate of MF membranes for PSWW treatment was restored by 15 min in-line cleaning with Micro brand detergent. Moreover, Marchesi et al [37] recovered 95% of water flux by cleaning the MF and UF membranes sequentially with sodium hypochlorite, citric acid, sodium hydroxide, and ultrapure water. Some pretreatment approaches can be adopted to alleviate membrane fouling before the membrane filtration process.…”

Section: Membrane Fouling and Cleaning Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The study revealed that the MF membrane produced a filtrate with zero turbidity and almost 100% removal of COD and TSS, thus satisfying the COD and TSS norms for discharging and reusing, which can help attenuate the water shortage crisis. A study was led by Marchesi et al [37] to recycle the pre-chiller wastewater generated from the poultry carcass chilling process by using MF membranes. Both hollow fiber PA membrane with a pore size of 0.20 µm on a bench scale and spiral-wound membrane with a 0.1 µm pore size on a pilot scale provided complete retention of turbidity, apparent color, fat, and microorganisms.…”

Section: Microfiltrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review

Fatima

Kommalapati

2021

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Poultry slaughterhouses produce a large amount of wastewater, which is usually treated by conventional methods. The traditional techniques face some challenges, especially the incapability of recovering valuable nutrients and reusing the treated water. Therefore, membrane technology has been widely adopted by researchers due to its enormous advantages over conventional methods. Pressure-driven membranes, such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), and reverse osmosis (RO), have been studied to purify poultry slaughterhouse wastewater (PSWW) as a standalone process or an integrated process with other procedures. Membrane technology showed excellent performance by providing high efficiency for pollutant removal and the recovery of water and valuable products. It may remove approximately all the pollutants from PSWW and purify the water to the required level for discharge to the environment and even reuse for industrial poultry processing purposes while being economically efficient. This article comprehensively reviews the treatment and reuse of PSWW with MF, UF, NF, and RO. Most valuable nutrients can be recovered by UF, and high-quality water for reuse in poultry processing can be produced by RO from PSWW. The incredible performance of membrane technology indicates that membrane technology is an alternative approach for treating PSWW.

show abstract

Section: Membrane Fouling and Cleaning Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Microfiltrationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review

Fatima

Kommalapati

2021

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The performance of the membrane is mainly characterized by the permeate flux and retention properties [5]. Membrane separation has one particular advantage over other separation processes such as distillation, crystallization and adsorption because it relies on physical separation without phase change and usually no addition of chemicals.…”

Section: Hybrid Membrane Bioreactormentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Abattoir industries consume about 26 L of potable water per bird to clean the blood off of slaughtered animals, clean off the slaughtering surfaces, cleaning of by-products, steam generation, and for chilling [3]. The slaughtering process and the periodic washing of residue particles in the slaughterhouse result in large quantities of water containing high amounts of biodegradable organic matter [4,5]. The contribution of organic load to these effluents usually comes from different materials such as undigested food, blood, fats, oil, and grease (FOG) and lard, loose meat, paunch, colloidal particles, soluble proteins, manure, grit, and suspended materials [4].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…As a result, aerobic and anaerobic treatment systems have become dominant and favorable options [9,13]. AWW contains high concentrations of organic contaminants and is rich in proteins and lipids, making it ideal for biogas production [4], as well as being a good candidate for the highly attractive anaerobic digestion [5]. According to Ozdemir and Yetilmezsoy [14], analysis confirmed that the bio-diesel produced from the waste fats, oils and grease (FOG) obtained from slaughterhouse waste showed excellent fuel properties when compared to biodiesel produced from other common crop-based feedstocks.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Multi-Integrated Systems for Treatment of Abattoir Wastewater: A Review

Gutu

Basitere

Harding

et al. 2021

Water

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biological wastewater treatment processes such as activated sludge and anaerobic digestion remain the most favorable when compared to processes such as chemical precipitation and ion exchange due to their cost-effectiveness, eco-friendliness, ease of operation, and low maintenance. Since Abattoir Wastewater (AWW) is characterized as having high organic content, anaerobic digestion is slow and inadequate for complete removal of all nutrients and organic matter when required to produce a high-quality effluent that satisfies discharge standards. Multi-integrated systems can be designed in which additional stages are added before the anaerobic digester (pre-treatment), as well as after the digester (post-treatment) for nutrient recovery and pathogen removal. This can aid the water treatment plant effluent to meet the discharge regulations imposed by the legislator and allow the possibility for reuse on-site. This review aims to provide information on the principles of anaerobic digestion, aeration pre-treatment technology using enzymes and a hybrid membrane bioreactor, describing their various roles in AWW treatment. Simultaneous nitrification and denitrification are essential to add after anaerobic digestion for nutrient recovery utilizing a single step process. Nutrient recovery has become more favorable than nutrient removal in wastewater treatment because it consumes less energy, making the process cost-effective. In addition, recovered nutrients can be used to make nutrient-based fertilizers, reducing the effects of eutrophication and land degradation. The downflow expanded granular bed reactor is also compared to other high-rate anaerobic reactors, such as the up-flow anaerobic sludge blanket (UASB) and the expanded granular sludge bed reactor (EGSB).

show abstract

Green/sustainable treatment of washing machine greywater for reuse in the built environment

Rodrigues¹,

Morais²,

Paula³

2022

Cleaner Engineering and Technology

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Use of membranes for the treatment and reuse of water from the pre-cooling system of chicken carcasses

Cited by 11 publications

References 25 publications

Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review

Treatment of Poultry Slaughterhouse Wastewater with Membrane Technologies: A Review

Multi-Integrated Systems for Treatment of Abattoir Wastewater: A Review

Green/sustainable treatment of washing machine greywater for reuse in the built environment

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About