2022
DOI: 10.1002/lom3.10515
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of metal oxide semiconductor sensors to measure methane in aquatic ecosystems in the presence of cross‐interfering compounds

Abstract: Monitoring dissolved methane in aquatic ecosystems contributes significantly to advancing our understanding of the carbon cycle in these habitats and capturing their impact on methane emissions. Low‐cost metal oxide semiconductors (MOS) gas sensors are becoming an increasingly attractive tool to perform such measurements, especially at the air–water interface. However, the performance of MOS sensors in aquatic environmental sciences has come under scrutiny because of their cross‐sensitivity to temperature, moi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, Butturini and Fonollosa [ 124 ] reported a low-cost metal oxide semiconductor sensor system for measuring methane concentrations in aquatic ecosystems. The experimental setup included a flow-through configuration with a peristaltic pump controlling the sample flow rate.…”
Section: Sensor Fabrication Techniques and Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, Butturini and Fonollosa [ 124 ] reported a low-cost metal oxide semiconductor sensor system for measuring methane concentrations in aquatic ecosystems. The experimental setup included a flow-through configuration with a peristaltic pump controlling the sample flow rate.…”
Section: Sensor Fabrication Techniques and Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Many previous TGS 2611-E00 studies have attempted to measure [CH 4 ] by devising various algorithms based on TGS resistance and environmental measurements. 31,34,[41][42][43] On the other hand, the TGS 2611-C00 has featured in fewer CH 4 studies but has delivered promising results, with [CH 4 ] exhibiting a clear correlation against TGS resistance. 19,29,44,45 Elsewhere, the TGS 2602 is not marketed as a CH 4 sensor and is instead designed to detect odorous species including hydrogen sulphide (H 2 S) and ammonia, though it is also sensitive to hydrogen, ethanol and other volatile organic compounds.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%