2005
DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(05)95014-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Microsatellites for Parentage and Kinship Analyses in Animals

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 37 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2008b; Wagner et al. 2006; Webster & Reichart 2005): null alleles fail to amplify during PCR, often because of mutations within the primer site. Results obtained in two independent estimates of null homozygote frequency are consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2008b; Wagner et al. 2006; Webster & Reichart 2005): null alleles fail to amplify during PCR, often because of mutations within the primer site. Results obtained in two independent estimates of null homozygote frequency are consistent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the characteristics of microsatellites make them well suited for parentage studies (Webster and Reichart 2005), regional implementation of PBT in the Columbia River basin required multiple independent laboratories to annually genotype tens of thousands of samples at the same suite of loci and necessitated the use of a different class of marker. The first was the identification of molecular markers with enough genetic variation to provide accurate parentage assignment even when thousands of potential parents from different populations across multiple spawn years were analyzed simultaneously.…”
Section: Development Of Pbt-tools and Techniques Molecular Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microsatellite DNA markers are among the most likely to conform to the assumption of neutrality and have proven to be powerful in differentiating geographically isolated populations and sibling species and subspecies [30]. The qualities of microsatellites make them very useful as genetic markers for studies of population differentiation and stock identification [35, 36], in kinship and parentage exclusion [37, 38] and in genome mapping [39]. Microsatellites are also being used as genetic markers for identification of population structure, genome mapping, pedigree analysis, and to resolve taxonomic ambiguities in many other animals besides fishes [40–49].…”
Section: Application Of Microsatellites In Population Structure Anmentioning
confidence: 99%