2001
DOI: 10.1007/s11908-001-0057-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of modeling techniques to aid in antibiotic selection

Abstract: Over the past decade, the use of modeling techniques in the development of novel antibiotics has been primarily associated with in vitro dynamic models. These models allow comparisons among different antibiotics by simulating human pharmacokinetics. Although dynamic models have been used extensively, their full potential has not been achieved because of inadequate experimental design and/or suboptimal quantitation of bacterial killing/regrowth curves inherent in many studies. These issues are discussed in this… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 36 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, based on I E -log AUC/MIC relationships established in our in vitro study [21], the AUC/MIC breakpoint for grepafloxacin (78 h), equivalent to that of ciprofloxacin (125 h), appeared to be very close to the breakpoint of grepafloxacin reported in a clinical setting (75 h [22]). The AUC/MIC breakpoint of levofloxacin (130 h) predicted in another in vitro study [23] corresponds to C max /MIC of 13 that is also consistent with the C max /MIC breakpoint of 12 reported in patients [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…For example, based on I E -log AUC/MIC relationships established in our in vitro study [21], the AUC/MIC breakpoint for grepafloxacin (78 h), equivalent to that of ciprofloxacin (125 h), appeared to be very close to the breakpoint of grepafloxacin reported in a clinical setting (75 h [22]). The AUC/MIC breakpoint of levofloxacin (130 h) predicted in another in vitro study [23] corresponds to C max /MIC of 13 that is also consistent with the C max /MIC breakpoint of 12 reported in patients [24].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 63%
“…Moreover, these attempts were often incorrect: erroneous conclusions about the advantages of one predictor over another resulted from the use of inconsistent functions relating the effect to its predictors, inappropriate combining of data obtained with pharmacokinetically different antibiotics, etc. Methodological pitfalls in analysis of the predictor-response relationships have been discussed in detail elsewhere (12).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gatifloxacin and moxifloxacin have elimination half-lives of 8 and 10 h, respectively, and are given once daily (29). In modeling techniques, the T Ͼ MIC measurement has been shown to be a good predictor of antimicrobial effects (time kill and regrowth) and useful in determining the most appropriate dosing regimen when comparing fluoroquinolones (8). Furthermore, concentration-independent killing has been observed with various fluoroquinolones against anaerobic bacteria (27).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%