2005
DOI: 10.1002/mc.20146
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of mononucleotide repeat markers for detection of microsatellite instability in mouse tumors

Abstract: Tumors lacking DNA mismatch repair activity (MMR) from patients with Hereditary Nonpolyposis Colorectal Cancer (HNPCC) or those with sporadic colorectal cancer can be identified by the presence of high levels of instability in repetitive sequences known as microsatellites (MSI). The assessment of MSI phenotype in human tumors helps to establish a clinical diagnosis and is accomplished with a reference panel of five mononucleotide repeats. By contrast, detection of MSI in mouse tumors has proven to be problemat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
50
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
50
0
Order By: Relevance
“…13,14,19,20 Although adequate in the great majority of circumstances, analysis of additional repeats may be needed in some cases, especially in individuals of African origin. 21,22 Five additional mononucleotide markers (PTHL3, SEC63, HPDMPK, U79260, and CAT25) were selected after in-depth review of the literature. 15,16 Two of these selected markers (SEC63 and CAT25) were identified as quasi-monomorphic and, similar to BAT26 and BAT25, highly sensitive to somatic deletions in MSI-H tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…13,14,19,20 Although adequate in the great majority of circumstances, analysis of additional repeats may be needed in some cases, especially in individuals of African origin. 21,22 Five additional mononucleotide markers (PTHL3, SEC63, HPDMPK, U79260, and CAT25) were selected after in-depth review of the literature. 15,16 Two of these selected markers (SEC63 and CAT25) were identified as quasi-monomorphic and, similar to BAT26 and BAT25, highly sensitive to somatic deletions in MSI-H tumors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Analysis for loss of heterozygosity of Apc alleles was done by multiplex PCR using Apc-P3 primer 5 ¶-GTTCTGTATCATG-GAAAGATAGGTGGTC-3 ¶, Apc-P4 primer 5 ¶-CACTCAAAACGCTTTTGAG-GGTTGATTC-3 ¶, Apc-P5 primer 5 ¶-GAGTACGGGGTCTCTGTCTCAGTGAA-3 ¶, targeted allele (580S), deleted allele (580D), and wild-type allele amplified as 314-bp (P3 and P4), 258-bp (P3 and P5), and 226-bp (P3 and P4) PCR products, respectively (15) Microsatellite stability analysis. Microsatellite analysis of mouse tumors was done as described using six microsatellite repeat markers previously shown to be informative in tumors from DNA mismatch repairdeficient mice (20)(21)(22): A33, GA29, D7Mit91, D17Mit123, mBat-26, and mBat-37.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To assess microsatellite instability in the CPC;Apc tumors, we studied three mononucleotide repeat and three dinucleotide repeat markers that have previously been shown to manifest instability in a subset of tissues and tumors from mice defective for mismatch repair (20)(21)(22). Of 66 CPC;Apc tumors analyzed with these six markers, one tumor showed variant alleles at one mononucleotide repeat marker (data not shown).…”
Section: Apc Targeting By Cdx2p-nls Cre In Colon Epitheliummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SP-PCR analysis was then performed on X-ray-induced AML samples using mBat-59. The PCR protocol used was as reported by Bacher et al (2005). Separation and detection of the amplified fragments was performed using an ABI PRISM 3100 Genetic Analyser (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) ( Figure 2).…”
Section: Assessment Of Msi Using Di-nucleotide Repeat Markersmentioning
confidence: 99%