2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.fishres.2015.04.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of multiple fish-removal methods during biomanipulation of a drinking water reservoir – Evaluation of the first four years

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on previous studies (Jurajda, Adámek, Janač et al, 2016), the reservoir was estimated to contain ≈8000 bream of this size class, or ≈181 ind/ha. As transmitter implantation took place in late autumn, it was not possible to determine the sex of the fish (no visible signs of sexual maturity).…”
Section: Fish Capture and Radio-taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on previous studies (Jurajda, Adámek, Janač et al, 2016), the reservoir was estimated to contain ≈8000 bream of this size class, or ≈181 ind/ha. As transmitter implantation took place in late autumn, it was not possible to determine the sex of the fish (no visible signs of sexual maturity).…”
Section: Fish Capture and Radio-taggingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, removal of perch juveniles, larvae and eggs may be undertaken as a biomanipulation measure, while larger perch are left behind (e.g. Jurajda et al 2016). However, what constitutes a "large piscivorous perch" differs considerably between studies, e.g.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…fish. In a broader sense, biomanipulation efforts also tend to focus on reducing benthivorous fish in addition to planktonophagous species (Jurajda et al 2016), whose feeding habits may support eutrophication processes in reservoirs through bioturbation (Adámek & Maršálek 2013). In the Czech Republic, there are a number of ongoing biomanipulation projects aimed at improving water quality in drinking water reservoirs through ecological measures rather than through chemical intervention.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Successful biomanipulation studies involving biological agents like barley straw showed cost-effective results with a small capital amount for treating eutrophic reservoirs in African provinces (Mustapha 2010). Biomanipulation experiments enhanced with ecohydrological approaches will always provide a sustainable and positive cost-bene t platform to treat water bodies over conventional methods involving costly ex-situ treatment or equipment analysis and other externalities (Jurajda et al 2016).…”
Section: Cost-bene T Analysis Of Eco-bioengineering Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%