We prevent disease (unfortunately nobody knows how much).-Almost all products should undergo risk assessment.-Toxicology pioneered quality (GLP) and validation (incl. relevance). -Toxicology was the first preclinical science to adapt evidence-based approaches. However, we are not doing a good job selling this. We are the nay-sayers in product development who delay or stop all these fabulous product launches and this typically at a very late stage close to marketing. We are the harbingers of bad news about our food and our environment, the risks that spoil enjoying them. And the discipline of toxicology seems so close to pharmacology that academic chairs are increasingly being
IntroductionThe theoretical case for a Human Exposome Project is easy to make. Wouldn't it be wonderful to understand the contribution of exposure to disease? The question is, however, how and is it feasible? But first, why call it a Human Exposome Project and not a Human Toxome Project 1 (Hartung and McBride, 2011)? This has to do with the undeserved mediocre reputation of toxicology, which has already led us to preferentially talk of safety science, risk science, regulatory science, next generation risk assessment, etc. Undeserved, because toxicology is actually big science: -Only a small percentage of disease is genetic, the rest is bad luck and exposure.