T he persistent shortage of organs has expanded the procedures for overcoming the gap between number of donations and number of patients listed for liver transplantation. The most recent acquisitions include the use of marginal donors, non-heartbeating donors, split livers, and living donors. Marginal donors represent a possible source of grafts, although the isolated or simultaneous presence of factors that contribute to this definition is linked almost invariably to risk for poor outcome. [1][2][3] In this view, use of elderly donors has been shown to negatively impact on short-and long-term survival after orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT), 4-6 with very few exceptions. 7,8 The ultimate frontier is the use of extremely old donors. Even if some investigators reported satisfying results in the short term with donors older than 70 years, 7-9 use of these grafts remains questionable when considering the longterm perspective. Data for donors older than 80 years are even fewer and limited to the description of early outcome. [8][9][10][11] We have been using donors older than 80 years with caution since 1998, and we report long-term results obtained to date, with a special focus on the impact of hepatitis C recurrence.
MethodsFrom 1998 to February 2003, a total of 17 OLTs were performed at our institution using livers procured from donors older than 80 years, representing 4% of all procedures performed during the same period. Median donor age in this series was 82 years (range, 80 to 87 years).Five patients have a short follow-up (Ͻ1 year). One patient received a graft from an 80-year-old donor, required early retransplantation for stenosis of the caval anastomosis on postoperative day 10, and had an uneventful postoperative course thereafter. The remaining four patients currently are alive with normal liver function after 1, 4, 5, and 5 months.Twelve patients, who constitute the population of this study, had a survival longer than 1 year.
Donor SelectionOur policy for acceptance of very old donors has been reported previously 9 and includes: (1) normal gross aspect of the organ (soft consistency, no apparent fatty infiltration) and no abnormal morphological characteristics shown by biopsy, when indicated; (2) no alteration in liver function test (LFT) results at the time of procurement; and (3) donor hemodynamic stability with the use of low doses of vasopressors before harvesting. In this regard, the 17 grafts used represent 50% of all organs from donors older than 80 years referred to our center in this period. Reasons for discard-