2012
DOI: 10.29252/jnkums.4.1.45
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of orange peel ash for removal of direct black 22 dye from aqueous environments

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 1 publication
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It shows that efficiency of dye removal is increased by increasing absorbent dosage, so that removal efficiency was increased to 98.41 and 96.97% respectively by increasing concentration from 1 to 10 g/l. In the study on Direct Black 22 dye removal from aqueous solution by activated carbon made from orange peel, it is reported that by increasing the adsorbent dosage from 0.1 to 1 g/l, respectively, removal efficiency increased as 87.1 and 95.2% ( 39 ). In the study on removal of acid orange 2 using egg shells from aqueous solutions, it is reported that with increasing adsorbent dosage, dye removal efficiency increased so that by increasing the adsorbent dose from 10 to 50 g/l, dye removal efficiency has been achieved as 35–74%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It shows that efficiency of dye removal is increased by increasing absorbent dosage, so that removal efficiency was increased to 98.41 and 96.97% respectively by increasing concentration from 1 to 10 g/l. In the study on Direct Black 22 dye removal from aqueous solution by activated carbon made from orange peel, it is reported that by increasing the adsorbent dosage from 0.1 to 1 g/l, respectively, removal efficiency increased as 87.1 and 95.2% ( 39 ). In the study on removal of acid orange 2 using egg shells from aqueous solutions, it is reported that with increasing adsorbent dosage, dye removal efficiency increased so that by increasing the adsorbent dose from 10 to 50 g/l, dye removal efficiency has been achieved as 35–74%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%