1985
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.1985.tb06502.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of P coda for determination of yield on nuclear explosions

Abstract: Spectral analysis of P and P coda from NTS explosions recorded at NORSAR shows that magnitudes based on spectral integration of P coda provide a significantly more precise measure of yield than those based on the initial P. Coda amplitudes and spectra are considerably less sensitive to nearsource variations than the direct P. A plot of P-coda magnitude, after correcting for the effects of attenuation in the upper mantle and the source spectrum based on knowledge of approximate yield or mb, versus log yield app… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1988
1988
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the later Lg coda is caused by scattering (Der et al 1984), the focusing/defocusing effect is expected to be greatly reduced by the averaging effect of the scattering process. A similar averaging effect on P coda has been extensively used to obtain more stable measurement of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions (e.g., Ringdal 1983; Bullitt & Cormier 1984;Gupta et al 1985; Gupta & Blandford 1987;Baumgardt 1985a, b;Lay 1987;Lay & Welc 1987). Lg coda Q measurements, however, tend to be more subject to random errors due deviations of type (i) above, or by systematic errors caused by the assumption of an incorrect geometrical spreading term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the later Lg coda is caused by scattering (Der et al 1984), the focusing/defocusing effect is expected to be greatly reduced by the averaging effect of the scattering process. A similar averaging effect on P coda has been extensively used to obtain more stable measurement of earthquakes and underground nuclear explosions (e.g., Ringdal 1983; Bullitt & Cormier 1984;Gupta et al 1985; Gupta & Blandford 1987;Baumgardt 1985a, b;Lay 1987;Lay & Welc 1987). Lg coda Q measurements, however, tend to be more subject to random errors due deviations of type (i) above, or by systematic errors caused by the assumption of an incorrect geometrical spreading term.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…noted that these Lg data do not exhibit the same degree of consistency as that of published P coda data[Gupta et al, 1985]• observed at a single teleseismic station, for the same events. The consistency of the data was determined by comparing with an my(P), estimated from ISC data[Marshall et al, 1984] using hundreds of stations Richards [1988].…”
mentioning
confidence: 50%
“…Richards [1988] has noted that teleseismic body waves do not re]ate reliably to yield unless data from many stations are combined. Richards [1988] noted that these Lg data do not exhibit the same degree of consistency as that of published P coda data [Gupta et al, 1985]• observed at a single teleseismic station, for the same events. In a study by Nuttl{[1986a], 22 Nevada Test Site (NTS) nuclear explosions in hard rock were analyzed.…”
Section: Fluctuations Of Direct Versus Scattered Phasesmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Several authors have examined the relative performance of magnitudes based on teleseismic P coda and direct P as relative size estimators, concluding that P coda generally yields more precise size estimates (BuLLITT and CORMIER,. 1984;BAUMGARDT, 1985;GUPTA et al, 1985;LAY and WELC, 1987).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%