2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.yebeh.2017.05.036
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of perampanel in children and adolescents with Lennox–Gastaut Syndrome

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
23
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
2
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Perampanel efficacy has also been assessed in other defined epileptic syndromes. A recent study conducted in 13 Lennox-Gastaut syndrome patients reported that nine patients (69.2%) were responders, and seven patients (53.8%) were improved in cognitive function and/ or behavior [30]. Other studies also indicated a responder of 40-66.6% in a small group of nine patients [28,29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Perampanel efficacy has also been assessed in other defined epileptic syndromes. A recent study conducted in 13 Lennox-Gastaut syndrome patients reported that nine patients (69.2%) were responders, and seven patients (53.8%) were improved in cognitive function and/ or behavior [30]. Other studies also indicated a responder of 40-66.6% in a small group of nine patients [28,29,31].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A few observational studies of the use of PER in children and adolescents have been reported in the last 3 years. Data from these real-world clinical experiences, although comprising heterogeneous groups of patients, also indicated that PER was reasonably effective in pediatric patients with refractory epilepsy or with severe epileptic encephalopathies and generally with a well-tolerability profile [26][27][28][29][30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PER is a selective non-competitive antagonist of AMPA receptors [75], It was administrated as add-on therapy to 58 children and adolescents with refractory epilepsies, including five with LGS, showing ≥50% seizure frequency reduction in 31% and seizure freedom in 9.1% [70]. PER as adjunctive treatment was also assessed in a prospective study, involving a small sample-13 LGS patients-who received PER for a mean period of 10.8 months [71]. A ≥ 50% reduction in total seizure frequency was reported for 9 patients (69.2%), while 4 had nor improvement, neither seizure worsening, indicating a potential utility of PER in LGS.…”
Section: Other Aedsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While no results have been reported from the clinical trial to date, the efficacy and safety of perampanel in LGS patients has been demonstrated in retrospective, open-label, observational studies [113][114][115][116][117][118]. Response rates (≥ 50% seizure reduction) of 64.8% (46/71 adult patients [113]) and 69.2% (9/13 children/adolescents [117]) have been reported in LGS patients. In addition, in a large real-world study of 2396 individuals with treatment-resistant epilepsy who were treated with add-on perampanel, 9% were seizure free for ≥ 6 months, and the 1-year retention rate was 48% [118].…”
Section: Perampanelmentioning
confidence: 99%