1989
DOI: 10.1038/jcbfm.1989.105
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of PET Methods for Measurement of Cerebral Energy Metabolism and Hemodynamics in Cerebrovascular Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
48
0
1

Year Published

1990
1990
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 156 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
3
48
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The finding of elevated CBV within hypoperfused but still viable regions suggests compensatory vasodilatation in response to reduced cerebral perfusion pressure. 28,29 It has been suggested that normal or increased CBV indicates tissue unlikely to infarct. 30 However, in the present study, we found that normal or increased rCBV within rCBF and rMTTϾDWI mismatch regions may progress to infarction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The finding of elevated CBV within hypoperfused but still viable regions suggests compensatory vasodilatation in response to reduced cerebral perfusion pressure. 28,29 It has been suggested that normal or increased CBV indicates tissue unlikely to infarct. 30 However, in the present study, we found that normal or increased rCBV within rCBF and rMTTϾDWI mismatch regions may progress to infarction.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reperfusion after ischemia occurs within hours or days of stroke onset. 25 The precise timing of luxury perfusion is uncertain. This diagnosis requires simultaneous measurements of CBF and oxygen metabolism, the hallmark being CBF in excess of regional metabolism with a reduced oxygen extraction ratio.23,25,26 Perfusion SPECT studies have shown reduced, normal, or even elevated flow in subacute infarcts.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both CT and PET images obtained in patients provided poor grey-white matter discrimination, making it impossible to segment these anatomic areas and derive appropriately weighted averages for mean CBF and CMRO2 in mixed ROIs. Consequently, unweighted mean data values were obtained from large mixed grey and white matter ROIs in patients and controls, while recognizing that the effect of tissue heterogeneity on 15 O PET models would result in falsely low CBF and CMRO2 values (Baron et al, 1989;Correia et al, 1985;Herscovitch and Raichle, 1983). These data allowed comparison of patients and controls.…”
Section: Image Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%