2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.01.241
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of PROMETHEE Method for Decision Making in Bus Fleet Maintenance Proposal of Framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PROMETHEE was first proposed by Jean Pierre Brans in 1984. This method belongs to the category of subordination relationships methods over classification, letting the ranking of alternatives from best to worst (Sanches et al, 2019). The method is based on mutual comparison of each alternative with respect to each of the criterion [15].…”
Section: Promethee IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…PROMETHEE was first proposed by Jean Pierre Brans in 1984. This method belongs to the category of subordination relationships methods over classification, letting the ranking of alternatives from best to worst (Sanches et al, 2019). The method is based on mutual comparison of each alternative with respect to each of the criterion [15].…”
Section: Promethee IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A full architecture able to implement all the facilities fleet management, including the use of external sensors and microcontrollers, has been analyzed in [25]. Different frameworks have been proposed for decision-making processes in bus fleet maintenance [26]. Concerning driver behavior, clustering techniques are suitable to classify characteristics such as safe and ecological driving [27].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In companies of road transport sector, the efficient use of assets is linked to a well-structured fleet assessment and replacement policy. Some cases of fleet replacement applied to the city bus segment are reported in ( [13], [28], [39], [47], [84], [88], [89], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [111] and [118]). [13] proposes a policy for optimal replacement intervals for programming technical systems based only on the maintenance cost parameter: a system is replaced by a new one as soon as the maintenance cost within a replacement cycle reaches or exceeds one certain level.…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A numerical solution is proposed and illustrated by [99], using data from a given fleet, they considered a two-cycle replacement model, with decision variables based on the age of replacement of the current fleet, where the size of the new fleet is considered, the optimal values for the decision variables can be found by minimizing the total cost discounted per unit of time or the value of the equivalent income. Many studies consider reliability parameters and maintenance costs to help assess more rational replacement decisions, for example: ( [88], [89], [91], [92], [93], [94], [95], [96], [97], [98], [99], [111] and [118]).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation