2010
DOI: 10.1192/pb.bp.108.023762
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of psychotropic medication in seven English psychiatric intensive care units

Abstract: Aims and methodTo describe the psychotropic medication given to 332 patients admitted consecutively to seven English psychiatric intensive care units (PICUs) by prospective, multicentre case-note analysis.ResultsOverall, 104 (32%) patients received rapid tranquillisation or zuclopenthixol acetate by intramuscular injection; 72 (23%) received more than one regular antipsychotic drug simultaneously. It was reported that 20 patients received high-dose antipsychotic medication, which was probably an underestimate.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants reported inadequate knowledge of evidenced-based chemical restraint practices substantiated in their descriptions of practices contradictory to research evidence. The current study findings are consistent with those of previous researchers who claimed that mental health nurses' medication practices and choices often were based on unit culture (Brown et al, 2010) and tradition (Stewart et al, 2012). Few descriptions were provided of the negative impacts of chemical restraint.…”
Section: Supporting Medication Best Practicessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Participants reported inadequate knowledge of evidenced-based chemical restraint practices substantiated in their descriptions of practices contradictory to research evidence. The current study findings are consistent with those of previous researchers who claimed that mental health nurses' medication practices and choices often were based on unit culture (Brown et al, 2010) and tradition (Stewart et al, 2012). Few descriptions were provided of the negative impacts of chemical restraint.…”
Section: Supporting Medication Best Practicessupporting
confidence: 90%
“…RT as defined by our criterion of 'the administration of any type of PRN intramuscular injection' was relatively low (13%) and almost half the rate found in Brown et al's (2010) study of seven PICUs in England (found to be 22%). Only one administration of zuclopenthixol acetate occurred compared to Brown et al's 17%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…This has been highlighted by the results of a recent multi-centre survey which involved mainly units that participated in the network process (Brown et al, 2008;Brown et al, 2010;). Recognising this, the then National Institute for Mental Health in England (NIMHE) helped fund NAPICU to deliver a clinical governance network process which specifically focused upon development of quality within four specific spheres of PICU / low secure care .…”
Section: Why?mentioning
confidence: 99%