2018
DOI: 10.1080/10715762.2018.1529867
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of quantum-chemical descriptors to analyse reaction rate constants between organic chemicals and superoxide/hydroperoxyl (O2•−/HO2)

Abstract: The reaction between superoxide (O 2 2) and organic chemicals is of interest in many scientific disciplines including biology and synthetic chemistry, as well as for the evaluation of chemical fate in the environment. Due to limited data and lack of congeneric modelling, the involvement of superoxide in many complex processes cannot be adequately evaluated. In this study, we developed new quantitative structure-property relationship (QSPR) models for the prediction of the aqueous-phase rate constant for the re… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 89 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Electron transfer versus hydrogen abstraction. For electron transfer by OH (eqn (2) and (3)), the s LFER (Hammett substituent constant) value, AE2SD, is 2.2 AE 0.2 p(k r )/eV, similar to that of HOO /O 2 À (s LFER = 2.1-2.5 p(k r )/eV) including ET 21.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Electron transfer versus hydrogen abstraction. For electron transfer by OH (eqn (2) and (3)), the s LFER (Hammett substituent constant) value, AE2SD, is 2.2 AE 0.2 p(k r )/eV, similar to that of HOO /O 2 À (s LFER = 2.1-2.5 p(k r )/eV) including ET 21.…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Comparison of D(DG r ) with experimental data allowed to approximate s LFER for various radicals (e.g. O 2 À /HOO and aryl radicals 20,21 ). Curiously, for those radicals, s LFER was identical (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Shapes of potential curves ( r ) affect importance of normalΔ()normalΔGCS relative to normalΔ()normalΔGPF (endo/exothermicity, Figure 1), via σ values (Equation ). [ 19,38,39 ] From literature, [ 19,40,41 ] we obtained a constant value of 10 2.3 M −1 s −1 eV −1 for σPF. Via a radical channel/pathway, electrophilic aromatic substitution for various reagents adheres to CS: Transition energies (−Δh ν /2.3RT) correlate with log( k R1 / k R2 ) with a slope of ~1; thus, σCS = 10 2.3 M −1 s −1 eV −1 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 95%