2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0025-6196(11)61097-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Random Skin Biopsy for Diagnosis of Intravascular Large B-Cell Lymphoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
109
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 110 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
109
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…There were 11 patients with pathologically confirmed IVL. Nine of those 11 patients were diagnosed with IVL by random skin biopsy, and the remaining 2 patients were diagnosed by bone marrow biopsy alone 6,7 with immunohistochemistry. Diagnoses of IVL were made by an expert hematopathologist in accordance with the latest World Health Organization classification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…There were 11 patients with pathologically confirmed IVL. Nine of those 11 patients were diagnosed with IVL by random skin biopsy, and the remaining 2 patients were diagnosed by bone marrow biopsy alone 6,7 with immunohistochemistry. Diagnoses of IVL were made by an expert hematopathologist in accordance with the latest World Health Organization classification.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1,2 The variety of nonspecific clinical symptoms, including pyrexia, neurologic abnormalities, respiratory distress, and lack of lymphadenopathy, makes it difficult to diagnose lymphomas. [3][4][5] However, recent recognition of the disease and the introduction of various diagnostic modalities, including random skin biopsy, 6,7 and 18 F-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose (FDG)-positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) (PET/CT) 8,9 have facilitated the in vivo diagnosis of IVL and prompt initiation of chemotherapy. The use of rituximab in combination with standard cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisolone (R-CHOP) 10 has resulted in a marked improvement in the survival rate of patients with IVL.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because many patients with IVLBCL have accompanying multiple organ failure and hemorrhagic diathesis, it can be difficult to perform an invasive biopsy. Accordingly, as random skin biopsy is regarded as minimally invasive, it is the established diagnostic method (Gill et al 2003;Asada et al 2007;Barnett et al 2008). In our case, random skin biopsies provided findings of IVLBCL, although the patient did not show any abnormal skin lesions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Laboratory tests reveal the elevation of sIL2R in over 80% of IVL patients. A definitive diagnosis of IVL is usually made by bone marrow biopsy or random skin biopsy (4,5), but both procedures are painful and cause scarring. In contrast, we found that an endoscopic biopsy was useful for the definitive diagnosis of IVL in our two patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, however, an increasing number of living patients are diagnosed (3). While the definitive diagnosis of IVL has been achieved by bone marrow biopsy and random skin biopsy (4,5), there are no previous reports of diagnosis by endoscopic biopsy.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%