2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2011.10.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of real-time polymerase chain reaction (rtPCR) as a diagnostic tool for influenza infection in a vaccine efficacy trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, and in agreement with a recent report, PCR represented a sensitive and accurate method for iden- tifying and typing influenza virus strains in samples from randomized prospective clinical trials (29). PCR also appeared to be more efficient at detecting A(H3N2) viruses than the culturebased methods, possibly related to the reduced sensitivity of culture method with A/Brisbane/10/07 lineage strains (29,39,40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, and in agreement with a recent report, PCR represented a sensitive and accurate method for iden- tifying and typing influenza virus strains in samples from randomized prospective clinical trials (29). PCR also appeared to be more efficient at detecting A(H3N2) viruses than the culturebased methods, possibly related to the reduced sensitivity of culture method with A/Brisbane/10/07 lineage strains (29,39,40).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…After thawing, these were cultured both on rhesus monkey kidney (RMK) cells and Madin-Darby canine kidney (MDCK) cells with incubation at 33 to 36°C for up to 2 weeks. Influenza virus A/B typing was performed on fixed cell cultures using standard immunofluorescence histology with influenza virus A-/B-specific antibodies (29).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…RT-qPCR was performed on viral RNA from the clinical samples as described previously [24]. Viral load values were quantified and the sample was considered positive when the measured viral load was equal to or above the assay cut-off [24].…”
Section: Laboratory Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%