1993
DOI: 10.1002/jctb.280580114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of red mud for toxic metals removal: The case of nickel

Abstract: The presence of red mud was found to remove effectively nickel ions from dilute aqueous solutions (50 mg dm−3). Red mud, being an industrial solid by‐product/waste from alumina production during bauxite processing, was found to act simultaneously as an alkalinity regulator, causing precipitation of nickel as the insoluble hydroxide, as an adsorbent of the formed nickel hydroxide and as a flocculant of the resultant fine particulate matter. Sedimentation was subsequently considered as a possible solid/liquid se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
19
0
4

Year Published

2004
2004
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
19
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…A similar pH dependency has been reported for red mud (Zouboulis and Kydros, 1993), activated carbon (Kadirvelu et al, 2001), blast furnace slag (Dimitrova, 1996), bentonite (Banat et al, 2002), illite (Echeverrı´a et al, 2003) and gehlenite (Jha et al, 2004).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…A similar pH dependency has been reported for red mud (Zouboulis and Kydros, 1993), activated carbon (Kadirvelu et al, 2001), blast furnace slag (Dimitrova, 1996), bentonite (Banat et al, 2002), illite (Echeverrı´a et al, 2003) and gehlenite (Jha et al, 2004).…”
Section: Article In Presssupporting
confidence: 67%
“…Biosorption has been successfully used in the treatment of metal contaminated water using low cost materials, such as, marine algae [1], bacteria [2], fungi [3], industrial wastes [4,5] and several other materials.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An adsorption capacity of ca. 52 mg g −1 was observed for nickel on pomegranate peel adsorbent at 25 • C. Adsorption capacities from the present study were compared with other adsorbents from previous studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39] and are shown in Table 2. It is evident that the prepared adsorbent shows comparable adsorption efficacy for nickel removal from water.…”
Section: Adsorption Isothermsmentioning
confidence: 93%