SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 1988 1988
DOI: 10.1190/1.1892454
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of refractor elevation models in the computation of refraction statics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

1999
1999
1999
1999

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Baixas et al (1985) and Daly and Diggins (1988), for example, suggested that high-frequency variations in the base of the weathered layer could be indicative of an incorrect near-surface velocity. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/ an irregular refractor, a smooth depth profile and an irregular velocity profile, or an intermediate near-surface model-is an interpretive one.…”
Section: Refractor Depth and Near-surface Velocity Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Baixas et al (1985) and Daly and Diggins (1988), for example, suggested that high-frequency variations in the base of the weathered layer could be indicative of an incorrect near-surface velocity. Redistribution subject to SEG license or copyright; see Terms of Use at http://library.seg.org/ an irregular refractor, a smooth depth profile and an irregular velocity profile, or an intermediate near-surface model-is an interpretive one.…”
Section: Refractor Depth and Near-surface Velocity Ambiguitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Data from Michigan to illustrate refractor depth and near-surface velocity ambiguity: (a) delay time profile; (b) two possible near-surface models, A and B, which match the delay times and their associated datum static corrections; (c) common-midpoint stacked data with datum static corrections derived from models A and B (afterDaly and Diggins, 1988).129.78.139.28. Data from Michigan to illustrate refractor depth and near-surface velocity ambiguity: (a) delay time profile; (b) two possible near-surface models, A and B, which match the delay times and their associated datum static corrections; (c) common-midpoint stacked data with datum static corrections derived from models A and B (afterDaly and Diggins, 1988).129.78.139.28.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%