2022
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-022-11490-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of remote monitoring and integrated platform for the evaluation of sleep quality in adult-onset idiopathic cervical dystonia

Abstract: Background Up to 70% of individuals diagnosed with adult-onset idiopathic focal cervical dystonia (AOIFCD) report difficulties with sleep. Larger cohort studies using wrist-worn accelerometer devices have emerged as an alternative to smaller polysomnography studies, in order to evaluate sleep architecture. Methods To measure activity during the sleep/wake cycle, individuals wore a consumer-grade wrist device (Garmin vivosmart 4) continuously over 7 days on… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Daytime sleepiness: This was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [51]. It estimates the probability (0-never; 1-few; 2-moderate; 3-many) of falling asleep in eight different situations.…”
Section: Recovery Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Daytime sleepiness: This was evaluated using the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) [51]. It estimates the probability (0-never; 1-few; 2-moderate; 3-many) of falling asleep in eight different situations.…”
Section: Recovery Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Selecting the most informative and feasible method of sleep assessment in people with dystonia remains a crucial goal. A recent multi-modal study of sleep quality used 1-week remote monitoring of 50 people with CD and 50 control participants through a consumer-grade wrist triaxial accelerometer, coupling it to daily sleep diary and other non-motor symptom questionnaires [53]. Accelerometry showed significantly longer total sleep time and time spent in NREM sleep in CD patients compared to control subjects, however, also evident was discrepancy between self-report and wearable data, significant for both dystonia and control subjects.…”
Section: Sleep Disruptionmentioning
confidence: 99%