2020
DOI: 10.3390/rs12040727
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of SAR and Optical Time Series for Tropical Forest Disturbance Mapping

Abstract: Frequent cloud cover and fast regrowth often hamper topical forest disturbance monitoring with optical data. This study aims at overcoming these limitations by combining dense time series of optical (Sentinel-2 and Landsat 8) and SAR data (Sentinel-1) for forest disturbance mapping at test sites in Peru and Gabon. We compare the accuracies of the individual disturbance maps from optical and SAR time series with the accuracies of the combined map. We further evaluate the detection accuracies by disturbance patc… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
43
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 76 publications
(131 reference statements)
3
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Reiche et al [42] used the Sentinel-1 radar and optical MODIS data to determine tropical forest cover loss in Indonesia, and achieved producer's and user's accuracy of 95%. Radar data has also been used for tropical forest disturbance mapping in Peru and Gabon [43]. The authors combined a time series of optical Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 with radar Sentinel-1, and mapped non-forest, undisturbed forest and disturbed forest, obtaining an overall accuracy of 93% for Peru and 98% for Gabon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Reiche et al [42] used the Sentinel-1 radar and optical MODIS data to determine tropical forest cover loss in Indonesia, and achieved producer's and user's accuracy of 95%. Radar data has also been used for tropical forest disturbance mapping in Peru and Gabon [43]. The authors combined a time series of optical Landsat-8, Sentinel-2 with radar Sentinel-1, and mapped non-forest, undisturbed forest and disturbed forest, obtaining an overall accuracy of 93% for Peru and 98% for Gabon.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These forest and land cover maps such as those produced by Hansen et al (2013) and European Space Agency (2015) are important for comparisons and sources of reference land cover maps. Radar-and opticalbased land cover maps are not very comparable and perhaps fusion methods are a way forward on this issue (Hirschmugl et al, 2020;Joshi et al, 2015).…”
Section: Satellite Image and Land Cover Applicationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensitivities of both sensors towards forest disturbances vary. Optical sensors are capable of detecting subtle changes in the tree foliage but show limitations when separating those from higher magnitude changes such as tree removal, while radar sensors are capable of detecting larger structural changes in forest cover but are not able to identify changes in tree foliage that do not result in structural forest changes [36,[48][49][50]. However, their synergistic potential for a more detailed temporal characterization of fire-related forest disturbances has yet to be studied [36].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%