“…This hypothesis proposed that good year classes resulted from spatiotemporal alignment (match) of primary and secondary food resources and the pelagic larval period, while poor year classes occurred when there were mismatches (Cushing, , ; Peck, Huebert, & Llopiz, ). Yet, the underlying mechanisms that alter the timing of phytoplankton blooms and definitive links between secondary production and upper trophic levels are complex, variable, and highly uncertain (Edwards & Richardson, ; Friedland et al, ; Richards et al, ). Phytoplankton bloom timing, magnitude, and composition have species‐ and location‐specific impacts on recruitment (Platt, Fuentes‐Yaco, & Frank, ; Trzcinski, Devred, Platt, & Sathyendranath, ), but the duration of spatiotemporal overlap between larval fish and prey may be paramount to year‐class success (Kristiansen, Drinkwater, Lough, & Sundby, ).…”