Our aim was to compare the clinical results of patients had carpal tunnel release surgery under local anesthesia and general anesthesia.
Methods:We studied visual analogue scores and visual analogue patient satisfaction scores of 148 patients who underwent carpal tunnel release surgery. 100 patients who met the inclusion criteria were included in this study. There were 12 males 38 females in general anesthesia group and 15 males 35 females in local anesthesia group. The mean age in general anesthesia group was 51.4 (31-78) and in local anesthesia group was 54.4 (28-81).Results: Visual analogue scores in general anesthesia group was 7.9 and decreased 2.9 postoperatively in local anesthesia group visual analogue score was 8.0 and decreased 2.9 postoperatively (p > 0.05). Visual analogue patient satisfaction score was 7.6 in general anesthesia group and 7.9 in local anesthesia group (p > 0.05).
Conclusion:A high percentage of patients reported high levels of satisfaction, excellent results and improvements in their quality of life in both group. As the VAS and VAPSS were considered the primary outcome measure, the results of our study show that the type of anaesthesia has no effect on the results of surgical treatment of CTS. There were no significant differences in clinical results between 2 groups.