2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.11.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of simplified strategies to evaluate early treatment response in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

2
4
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
2
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This pattern of stratification of patients was also observed for the group of intensively treated children ( Figure 3B). These data support previously published preliminary results concerning a small number of patients submitted to two different treatment protocols 17 and suggest that positive MRD detection by a simplified technique at the end of induction therapy may be the most important prognostic factor in children with ALL. As also observed in the present study, the detection of high MRD rates (10 -2 to 10 -3 ) on day 15 30,31 or day 19 15 and between weeks 4 and 12 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] of induction therapy has been associated with an unfavorable prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This pattern of stratification of patients was also observed for the group of intensively treated children ( Figure 3B). These data support previously published preliminary results concerning a small number of patients submitted to two different treatment protocols 17 and suggest that positive MRD detection by a simplified technique at the end of induction therapy may be the most important prognostic factor in children with ALL. As also observed in the present study, the detection of high MRD rates (10 -2 to 10 -3 ) on day 15 30,31 or day 19 15 and between weeks 4 and 12 [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14] of induction therapy has been associated with an unfavorable prognosis.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The presence of two or more markers was detected in 88.4% of the cases investigated, showing that the simpli- fied technique can be used for the study of MRD in most children with ALL and confirming the preliminary data obtained with a similar methodology. 17 Although the present method is less sensitive, the results obtained were similar to those reported with the use of more complex techniques such as RQ-PCR and flow cytometry, mainly in the higher risk group. 2,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15] In addition, the frequency of detection of the rearrangements at diagnosis and the frequency of positivity for MRD during the phases analyzed were closely similar at the three treatment centers, showing good reproducibility of the technique used.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…They reported that the 10-year incidence of relapse or remission failure was significantly higher for patients with 0.01% or more leukemic cells on day 1912). A simplified MRD PCR method with consensus primers for Ig and TCR gene rearrangements rather than standard PCR method using tailor-made reagents for each patient have been reported to have a significant value in discriminating between good and poor responders among children with ALL10, 11, 23). Our study provides supportive evidence for the feasibility of a simplified MRD assay using minimal immunophenotypic markers.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More simplified methods for MRD detection during the early period of treatment have been reported to help identify patients at a high risk of relapse10-12). The purpose of our study was to analyze the results of a simplified flow cytometric assay based on aberrant expression of myeloid antigens or expression of CD19/CD10/CD34, and to determine the prognostic significance of MRD detected by flow cytometry during induction chemotherapy in children with ALL.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%