2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2012.10.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of social commitment robots in the care of elderly people with dementia: A literature review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
128
0
4

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 236 publications
(135 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
3
128
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…There is accumulating evidence that such robots can encourage social interaction (see Mordoch et al 2013), acting as social facilitators (Sharkey and Sharkey, 2012a). By doing so, they can be seen as promoting access to the capability of Affiliation (7 Affiliation A) by creating more opportunities to engage in social interaction.…”
Section: Companion Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is accumulating evidence that such robots can encourage social interaction (see Mordoch et al 2013), acting as social facilitators (Sharkey and Sharkey, 2012a). By doing so, they can be seen as promoting access to the capability of Affiliation (7 Affiliation A) by creating more opportunities to engage in social interaction.…”
Section: Companion Robotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Much of the recent research in the area of robots in healthcare has arisen from Canada [68], New Zealand [9–11], Europe [1216], and Australia [17]. While some of this work explores robots generally [7, 10], most examines the use of robots with the elderly in broad terms [9, 13, 14, 16, 17], with some focus on dementia [6, 11, 12, 15] and disability [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance and need for further studies with a more robust research design and larger samples have been emphasized. 24,25,34,35 The aim of this article was to examine effects on symptoms of agitation and depression in NH residents with moderate to severe dementia participating in Paro group activity compared with a control group.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%