The use of split-thickness dermal grafts for successful repair of corneal and scieral defects is reported in 10 patients (11 eyes) who had non-infectious, impending, or overt ocular perforation. In all patients, traditional methods of reconstruction were deemed inappropriate or had already failed. Corneoscieral defects occurred after various operations: pterygium excision, retinal detachment repair, insertion of a keratoprosthesis (Cardona implant) into an opaque, vascularised cornea, and penetrating keratoplasty. Other causes of corneoscieral defects were scleromalacia perforans, idiopathic systemic vasculitis, alkali burn, ocular cicatricial pemphigoid, and band keratopathy with recurrent erosion following intraocular metallic foreign body. We propose the use of split-thickness grafts: (1) when adjacent conjunctiva is inadequate to cover a corneoscieral defect owing to its large size or great depth or to conjunctival scarring from previous operations, injury, or ocular cicatricial pemphigoid; or (2) as an alternative to autogenous grafts such as conjunctiva, cartilage, fascia lata, tibial periosteum, or mucous membrane as well as to homologous scleral and lamellar grafts. Dermal grafts are advantageous in that they are autogenous, non-antigenic, survive on avascular surfaces, and self-epithelialise and, thus, need not be covered by conjunctiva. Furthermore, they are pliable, have excellent tensile strength, provide ample tectile support, and are abundantly available. Dermal grafts are harvested from the dermal bed of the thigh after an epidermal flap is hinged at one end. (BrJ Ophthalmol 1993; 77: 327-331) flap; the patient was fitted postoperatively with a cosmetic scleral shell.3 We report the use of split-thickness dermal grafts in 10 patients with corneoscleral defects for whom traditional methods were thought to be unsatisfactory or had already been attempted and failed. "
Methods
INDICATIONS FOR DERMAL GRAFTINGIndications for dermal grafts included: (1) small (1-2 mm) corneoscleral perforations, (2) areas of corneoscleral thinning too large or of too great a depth to be covered by other types ofgrafts or by adjacent conjunctiva, and (3) severe conjunctival scarring which precluded mobilisation of a conjunctival flap over the corneal or scleral defect. For the above reasons alternative methods such as cyanoacrylate tissue adhesive and bandage contact lens and other autogenous grafts such as conjunctiva, cartilage, mucous membrane, fascia, and tibial periosteum as well as homologous scleral and lamellar patch grafts were not used. In some patients such grafts were not employed because they were too bulky or did not contain epithelium.9" SURGICAL TECHNIQUE In all 10 patients, split-thickness dermal grafts were harvested from the outer aspect of the thigh using a power-driven Brown dermatome (Fig 1).