2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2020.110250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of standardized bioinformatics for the analysis of fungal DNA signatures applied to sample provenance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fungal ITS1 minibarcode OTUs from over 900 WLOH dust samples from different U.S. locations, a subset of which were used in this study, enabled the estimation of geographic provenance with a median prediction margin of 230 km (36). A similar approach was used to determine the worldwide country of origin from dust samples (37,38). These approaches avoid many of the pitfalls of taxonomic identification and species distribution estimation but, unlike our approach, require generation of a new reference dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fungal ITS1 minibarcode OTUs from over 900 WLOH dust samples from different U.S. locations, a subset of which were used in this study, enabled the estimation of geographic provenance with a median prediction margin of 230 km (36). A similar approach was used to determine the worldwide country of origin from dust samples (37,38). These approaches avoid many of the pitfalls of taxonomic identification and species distribution estimation but, unlike our approach, require generation of a new reference dataset.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of bioinformatic applications for NGS in forensic science has been recently underlined (Allwood et al 2020a;Allwood et al 2020b;Giampaoli et al 2018). The analysis of biological material, even from trace amounts in dust, has clear advantages for specific forensic applications, in particular, when we need to discern sample origin or geolocation (Allwood et al 2020a).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This approach increases bias in abundance (favouring the most abundant taxa), and where indexes are introduced in the second step there is potential for undetectable cross-contamination as the amplified sequences cannot be traced to the original source. The use of internal controls for more accurate quantitative measures and inclusion of positive controls have been suggested [131,132], however, for processing low biomass samples such controls present a potential contamination risk and are not advised [133].…”
Section: Quality Controlsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to these inconsistencies, comparisons between multiple datasets becomes difficult. To resolve this, Allwood et al 2020 have proposed a standardised approach for fungi analysis in dust [132].…”
Section: Moving Towards a Likelihood Ratiomentioning
confidence: 99%