2008
DOI: 10.1510/icvts.2008.188136
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of steel bands in sternotomy closure: implications in high-risk cardiac surgical population

Abstract: A retrospective-prospective descriptive and comparative study of two sternal closure techniques in a population of 621 patients divided into: group A, steel band closure (n=300) and group B, conventional technique closure (n=321), was carried out between January 2005 and December 2007 in order to describe and compare the results of both techniques in high-risk patients for sternal dehiscence and mediastinitis. Differences between both groups and association with risk factors were obtained using non-parametric … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…We performed a single center, retrospective review and had limited data on specifics about administration of systemic perioperative antibiotics. The frequency of DSWI declined over the study period with a notable decrease in the incidence between 2009 and 2010 (1.5% to 0.7%), probably due to implementation of updated STS antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines for cardiac surgery (5) and quality improvement campaigns for appropriate and timely administration of perioperative antibiotics, adoption of perioperative glucose management protocols (16), and patient-specific sternal closure techniques including double wires and sternal bands (17, 18). In addition, not all surgeons used vancomycin paste and there were changes in practice of the study period; however, we did not observe a relationship between individual surgeon and incidence of DSWI.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We performed a single center, retrospective review and had limited data on specifics about administration of systemic perioperative antibiotics. The frequency of DSWI declined over the study period with a notable decrease in the incidence between 2009 and 2010 (1.5% to 0.7%), probably due to implementation of updated STS antibiotic prophylaxis guidelines for cardiac surgery (5) and quality improvement campaigns for appropriate and timely administration of perioperative antibiotics, adoption of perioperative glucose management protocols (16), and patient-specific sternal closure techniques including double wires and sternal bands (17, 18). In addition, not all surgeons used vancomycin paste and there were changes in practice of the study period; however, we did not observe a relationship between individual surgeon and incidence of DSWI.…”
Section: Commentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing a more stable osteotomy and improving sternal osteosynthesis is the best way to prevent these complications [3,4,27,28] . More than 40 different techniques with various materials have been described for sternal closure [12][13][14][15][16] . Most techniques revolve around a different pattern of wire cerclage, rigid plate fixation, or various non-rigid methods of closure [29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Providing greater stability [3,4,6] and promoting primary osseous healing is crucial for preventing these complications [7][8][9][10][11] . More than 40 different techniques have been described for closing median sternotomy [12][13][14][15][16] . The biomechanical characteristics of different sternal closures may substantially improve sternotomy reduction and stability [17][18][19] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reported incidence of postoperative SWI varies considerably; because of differences in definitions and classification of infections and variations in follow-up [2,18-27]. Sternal wound infection (SWI) has a reported overall incidence between 0.5% and 6% [1].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sternal wound infection (SWI) has a reported overall incidence between 0.5% and 6% [1]. However, in high-risk patients the incidence has been estimated at between 12 and 20% with an associated mortality rate between 14% and 47% [7,18-22]. Schersten et al suggest that the incidence of SSI goes higher in studies reporting surgery on high-risk patients and also in patients undergoing emergency operations [28].…”
Section: Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%