1977
DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1977.01370030098018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Systemic Antibiotics for Prophylaxis in Surgery

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

1980
1980
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 135 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Burke [53] and Alexander and Altemeier [54] demon strated the effectiveness of systemic antibiotics in the prevention of wound infection if the antibiotics were given just before and during experimental operative procedures on animals. Chodak and Plaut [55] reviewed the application of this concept to general surgery per formed on humans and concluded some effectiveness could be demonstrated for abdominal and vaginal hys terectomies, total hip replacements, biliary surgery, ces arean surgery and microneurosurgical craniotomy. Geraghty and Feely [10] performed a randomized, con trolled trial and found the infection rate in the control group was 3.5% and in the antibiotic prophylaxis treated group to be 0.5%…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Burke [53] and Alexander and Altemeier [54] demon strated the effectiveness of systemic antibiotics in the prevention of wound infection if the antibiotics were given just before and during experimental operative procedures on animals. Chodak and Plaut [55] reviewed the application of this concept to general surgery per formed on humans and concluded some effectiveness could be demonstrated for abdominal and vaginal hys terectomies, total hip replacements, biliary surgery, ces arean surgery and microneurosurgical craniotomy. Geraghty and Feely [10] performed a randomized, con trolled trial and found the infection rate in the control group was 3.5% and in the antibiotic prophylaxis treated group to be 0.5%…”
Section: Antibiotic Prophylaxismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main reasons for the divided clinical opinion are: a perceived low level of infective complications, the cost of prophylactic regi mens, doubts about whether prophylaxis is appropriate when recent urine culture shows no growth, doubts about whether results from a single centre are generally applica ble and finally fears that resistant strains will emerge. Published studies have been criticised because of insuffi cient numbers and poor trial design and few have reached statistically valid conclusions [13,14]. Those clinicians who do believe in antibiotic prophylaxis do not agree about the dosage regimen; some advocate a single dose and others more prolonged cover.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, at the fifth post-operative day, or at the patient's discharge, whatever came first, any infection (proven or suspected) was (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16) or, if no study was available, on the wound classification (9,10), and was finalized on a consensus meeting of the National Working Group on Hospital Hygiene. * The second indication class was purposely kept large, in order to enhance acceptance of the classes 1 and 3.…”
Section: Data Gatheringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of well-controlled clinical trials determining the effectiveness of specific regimens for specific procedures have been conducted and the subject has been reviewed by several authors (11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%