Use of telehealth and outcomes before a visit to the emergency department: a cross-sectional study on walk-in patients in Switzerland

Abstract

AIMS OF THE STUDY: An increasing number of patients are using telehealth before contacting the healthcare system. If we are to optimise future telehealth strategies and adequately respond to patient needs, we need to know more about the frequency and characteristics of telehealth use. Our objectives were (i) to investigate whether patients use telehealth before consulting the emergency department (ED), (ii) to compare patients with and without use of telehealth, and (iii) to investigate adherence, confidence and satisfaction. MATERIALS AND METHODS:A survey was conducted among ED walk-in patients at a tertiary university hospital in Switzerland. Eligible patients were questioned about their use of telehealth before current presentation, during 30 shifts from 23 October to 15 December 2019. RESULTS: A total of 183 (43.9%) of 417 surveyed patients used telehealth, with the telephone being the most commonly used modality, especially among elderly patients. Patients using telehealth were more likely to be male (53.5%, p = 0.001) and were similar in age to non-users. Telehealth users tended to be better educated. Telehealth was predominantly used for semi-urgent non-traumatic diseases that did not lead to hospitalisation. All age groups expressed satisfaction with telehealth, trusted the recommendations and adhered to them. The main reason for "non-use" of telehealth was lack of knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: Lack of knowledge about telehealth opportunities and barriers in specific patient groups should be addressed to include all patients, and thus to exploit telehealth's many advantages.

The Utility of an Online Forward Triage Tool During the SARS-CoV-2 Pandemic: Health Care Provider and Health Authority Perspectives

“…institution emerged as very important to health care providers and authorities alike. These findings are in line with patient perspectives (13) and research from elsewhere (17). The source of the tool and the institution behind it therefore affect its adoption and utility (18).…”

Virtual Reality for Pain Relief in the Emergency Room (VIPER) – a prospective, interventional feasibility study

“…Recruitment in their study proved crucial with only a small number of patients ultimately able and willing to participate. Consistent with the “digital divide” for emerging technologies, they found younger patients were more willing to participate, a finding we did not replicate [ 43 , 44 ]. In the current study, patient recruitment was much less of an issue.…”

The worldwide impact of telemedicine during COVID-19: current evidence and recommendations for the future

“…With 24 h per day availability across the year, these services were already popular and widespread before the COVID-19 pandemic, with 2.5 million patient contacts per year [118] . Many major health insurance providers offer the "Telmed model", requiring the insured to have a telehealth consultation before visiting a medical practitioner's office [119] . This has led to almost half of all emergency hospital walk-ins to consult via a telehealth service before leaving their home [120] .…”

“…Many major health insurance providers offer the “ Telmed model ”, requiring the insured to have a telehealth consultation before visiting a medical practitioner’s office [ 119 ] . This has led to almost half of all emergency hospital walk-ins to consult via a telehealth service before leaving their home [ 120 ] . As could have plausibly been expected, the number of Swiss health insurance providers offering a telemedicine consultation system for their customers rapidly increased during the first COVID-19 pandemic lockdown [ 121 ] .…”