2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the acquired capability for suicide scale (ACSS) among United States military and Veteran samples: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
10
0
4

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
0
10
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the overall model exhibited such poor fit, we did not proceed with testing of measurement invariance. Instead, we contend that, consistent with previous recommendations (Ribeiro et al, 2014) that have not been fully implemented by researchers (Chu et al, 2017;Kramer et al, 2020), use of the full ACSS to assess capability for suicide is inadvisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Because the overall model exhibited such poor fit, we did not proceed with testing of measurement invariance. Instead, we contend that, consistent with previous recommendations (Ribeiro et al, 2014) that have not been fully implemented by researchers (Chu et al, 2017;Kramer et al, 2020), use of the full ACSS to assess capability for suicide is inadvisable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Accordingly, the ACSS was shortened to the seven items assessing fearlessness about death, the Acquired Capability for Suicide Scale—Fearlessness About Death (ACSS-FAD; Ribeiro et al, 2014), which exhibits improved psychometric properties but only captures fearlessness about death. Nonetheless, despite psychometric issues with the ACSS and recommendations to use the ACSS-FAD, the ACSS and its various iterations are still predominantly used to assess capability for suicide (see Chu et al, 2017; Kramer et al, 2020).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike many civilian samples (Klonsky et al, 2016), there were no associations between demographic variables and suicide‐related behaviors in our high‐risk veterans. One potential reason for this is limited demographic variability among veteran relative to civilian samples (Kramer et al, 2020). Alternatively, the lack of demographic associations may suggest that high‐risk suicide behaviors were more closely related to the severity of underlying psychopathology than demographic factors.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This finding raises questions about the validity of previous studies using this scale in adults, because they frequently combine individuals with varying histories of suicide attempt. However, a review of suicide capability among military personnel found that the FAD was the best IPTS-based assessment of capability, while emphasizing that their mixed findings suggest that the construct is in need of refinement (Kramer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Interpersonal-psychological Theory Of Suicide and Fadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research suggests that these changes might impact cognitions and risk factors for suicidal thoughts and behaviors (Bar-Joseph & Tzuriel, 1990). Furthermore, characteristics, events, and risk factors specific to military personnel limit the generalization of findings to nonmilitary populations (Kramer et al, 2020).…”
Section: Interpersonal-psychological Theory Of Suicide and Fadmentioning
confidence: 99%