Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Since the advent of routine automated platelet counting we have observed unexplained periparturient thrombocytopenia (PPT) in an unexpected number of periparturient women, ie, during labor or within 24 hr postpartum. Mean +/- SD platelet count in 686 random blood donors was 236 +/- 50 X 10(9)/L and 1.02% had a platelet count less than 136 X 10(9)/L; in 2,204 random prenatal and postpartum women mean count was significantly higher (275 +/- 86 X 10(9)/L; p less than 0.001). Of 1,621 periparturient women, 74 (4.6%) had unexplained PPT (mean +/- SD platelet count 122 +/- 24 X 10(9)/L, range 21-135 X 10(9)/L, N = 74). Platelet count in PPT usually rose to normal within 1 week of delivery; in 10% thrombocytopenia persisted greater than 6 months. PPT occurred in successive pregnancies with normal intervening platelet counts. Nine of 34 newborns of mothers with PPT were thrombocytopenic; there was no correlation between mother's and baby's platelet counts. In no case of PPT was there excessive bleeding in mother or infant. Positive indirect platelet radioactive antiglobulin tests (PRAT) were seen in 11% of normal postpartum women and in 90% of 22 women with PPT; 65% of the positive tests in PPT were due to reactions with anti-C3 only. In contrast, pregnant women with autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (AITP) had positive PRAT primarily because of anti-IgG (+/- anti-C3); only 10% were positive only with anti-C3. Results were concordant in all of eight women with PPT tested by both indirect and direct PRAT. Amount of C3 bound per platelet in direct or indirect PRAT was not predictive of degree of thrombocytopenia, but there was correlation of fg C3 per platelet detected by the two assays in individual patients (r = 0.8). Mean levels of serum C3, C4, and factor B in women with PPT did not differ from normal; individual patients had abnormal serum complements but no characteristic pattern was observed. Increased immune complexes were observed in 6% of normal subjects and 33% of women with PPT. Etiology and mechanism of PPT is unclear. Despite lack of clinical evidence in women with PPT of syndromes associated with increased platelet destruction, the presence of preeclampsia cannot be absolutely excluded. Similarly, although the pattern of antiglobulin sensitization in PPT differed markedly from that seen in AITP, autoimmune disorder cannot be excluded. Alloantibodies did not appear to be responsible for PPT. While PPT is usually benign, some patients had a markedly reduced platelet count. Recognition of the phenomenon may be important in obstetrics.
Since the advent of routine automated platelet counting we have observed unexplained periparturient thrombocytopenia (PPT) in an unexpected number of periparturient women, ie, during labor or within 24 hr postpartum. Mean +/- SD platelet count in 686 random blood donors was 236 +/- 50 X 10(9)/L and 1.02% had a platelet count less than 136 X 10(9)/L; in 2,204 random prenatal and postpartum women mean count was significantly higher (275 +/- 86 X 10(9)/L; p less than 0.001). Of 1,621 periparturient women, 74 (4.6%) had unexplained PPT (mean +/- SD platelet count 122 +/- 24 X 10(9)/L, range 21-135 X 10(9)/L, N = 74). Platelet count in PPT usually rose to normal within 1 week of delivery; in 10% thrombocytopenia persisted greater than 6 months. PPT occurred in successive pregnancies with normal intervening platelet counts. Nine of 34 newborns of mothers with PPT were thrombocytopenic; there was no correlation between mother's and baby's platelet counts. In no case of PPT was there excessive bleeding in mother or infant. Positive indirect platelet radioactive antiglobulin tests (PRAT) were seen in 11% of normal postpartum women and in 90% of 22 women with PPT; 65% of the positive tests in PPT were due to reactions with anti-C3 only. In contrast, pregnant women with autoimmune thrombocytopenic purpura (AITP) had positive PRAT primarily because of anti-IgG (+/- anti-C3); only 10% were positive only with anti-C3. Results were concordant in all of eight women with PPT tested by both indirect and direct PRAT. Amount of C3 bound per platelet in direct or indirect PRAT was not predictive of degree of thrombocytopenia, but there was correlation of fg C3 per platelet detected by the two assays in individual patients (r = 0.8). Mean levels of serum C3, C4, and factor B in women with PPT did not differ from normal; individual patients had abnormal serum complements but no characteristic pattern was observed. Increased immune complexes were observed in 6% of normal subjects and 33% of women with PPT. Etiology and mechanism of PPT is unclear. Despite lack of clinical evidence in women with PPT of syndromes associated with increased platelet destruction, the presence of preeclampsia cannot be absolutely excluded. Similarly, although the pattern of antiglobulin sensitization in PPT differed markedly from that seen in AITP, autoimmune disorder cannot be excluded. Alloantibodies did not appear to be responsible for PPT. While PPT is usually benign, some patients had a markedly reduced platelet count. Recognition of the phenomenon may be important in obstetrics.
The standard lymphocytotoxicity assay (LCT), a biotin-avidin enzyme immunoassay (ELISA), platelet suspension immunofluorescence test (PSIFT), and platelet radioactive antiglobulin test (PRAT) were examined in prospective crossmatching for selection of compatible random donor platelets for refractory patients. One hundred seven episodes of pooled random donor platelet transfusions were evaluated in 26 patients. There was good reproducibility of results by individual techniques. Concordance of results by the different methods was 40-60%. One-hour and 24 hr posttransfusion corrected count increments (CCI) were compared as parameters for assessing success or failure of the transfusion. Using a rank scoring system, the relative efficiency of predictiveness for all transfusions was PRAT greater than LCT greater than PSIFT greater than ELISA. Combination of PRAT and LCT afforded the best predictability and sensitivity was higher than for either PRAT or LCT alone (93 vs. 79 and 62%, respectively). Mean posttransfusion CCI (x 10(9)/L) following PRAT-compatible platelets was 13.9 +/- 12.7 at 1 hr and 7.3 +/- 6.9 at 24 hr; following PRAT-incompatible platelets, 5.7 +/- 7.8 (1 hr) and 2.1 +/- 4.1 (24 hr). Results were similar for LCT-tested platelets. A radioimmunofiltration modification of the PRAT developed and used in selected cases was simple, fast, efficient, and inexpensive. The study indicated that the techniques evaluated are practical and feasible for routine use in the provision of compatible random donor platelets to the refractory patient who has no other cause for increased platelet destruction.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.