2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.gore.2023.101156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Khorana score to predict venous thromboembolism in patients undergoing chemotherapy for uterine cancer

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Those patients would have potentially benefited from thromboprophylaxis. The original Khorana score 30 remains a widely known method for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy but has not been validated for many cancers and has shown poor predictability in female cancers such as ovarian 31 and endometrial cancers 32 . However, a combination with hypercoagulability marker carries potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Those patients would have potentially benefited from thromboprophylaxis. The original Khorana score 30 remains a widely known method for cancer patients receiving chemotherapy but has not been validated for many cancers and has shown poor predictability in female cancers such as ovarian 31 and endometrial cancers 32 . However, a combination with hypercoagulability marker carries potential.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a combination with hypercoagulability marker carries potential. Modifications of the Khorana score such as the PROTECHT have helped in the assessment of risks but the specificity is low (~52%) and the sensitivity is less than 100%, 6 but again has not shown good predictability in breast or gynecological cancers 32 . In the ROADMAP‐CAT study, several hypercoagulability markers were incorporated to improve risk assessment 33 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Platelet count was not found significantly altered in either DVT or PE, thereby questioning the usability of this marker in the use of the Khorana score as previously reported by our study group [ 18 ]. Khorana score is designed to a mix of ambulatory cancer out-patients but seems less likely to identify VTE high-risk patients as reported in ovarian cancer and lung cancer [ 19 , 20 ], and as we have previously shown that gastroesophageal cancer and gastric cancer may have a low frequency of VTE at the time of diagnosis, but the risk seems to increase upon start of cancer treatment, especially perioperative chemotherapy [ 21 ]. This could explain the difference in frequency of VTE and the various results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%