1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.sc.3100514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Memokath® for detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia after spinal cord injury – a cautionary tale

Abstract: We report on the intraurethral insertion of the Memokath in 24 patients (26 stents) to combat detrusor-sphincter dyssynergia developing after spinal cord injury. Most patients have high tetraplegia for whom self-catheterisation is very difficult, if not impossible. Our results have been disappointing in that 19 stents have had to be removed, mainly because of persisting urinary infection, migration of the stent, or because of failure to improve emptying, usually associated with poor detrusor function. Caution … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2001
2001
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
(6 reference statements)
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although initial results appeared promising, almost all the stents required removal for complications of urinary infection, migration and encrustation. 34 The 'working life' of a Memokath stent is 20-21 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although initial results appeared promising, almost all the stents required removal for complications of urinary infection, migration and encrustation. 34 The 'working life' of a Memokath stent is 20-21 months.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…42 Another study, however, failed to demonstrate a substantial bene®t; 19 out of 24 Memokath inserted had to be removed. 43 The authors of the study recommended caution when using the stents in DESD and not to use them in the presence of chronic urinary tract infection. (iv) Botulinum toxin injection into the external sphincter mechanism has had some success in patients with DESD.…”
Section: Operative Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They advised against the use of urethral stents in those with chronic urinary tract infection. 51 Urethral stents seem to be comparable, and in some outcome measures better, than external sphincterotomy, though concerns are still expressed about the long term risk of stent encrustation and there remains a de®nite risk of stent migration necessitating stent removal or replacement. Depending on the type of stent used this can be accomplished easily or may be associated with considerable urethral trauma.…”
Section: Sonimentioning
confidence: 99%