2018
DOI: 10.14735/amko2018434
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Metal Deletion Technique for Radiotherapy Planning in Patients with Cardiac Implantable Devices

Abstract: Background:The number of cancer patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices receiving radiotherapy is increasing. Irradiation of such patients can cause malfunctions in pacemakers and implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. In this respect, it is necessary to make a proper irradiation plan for such cancer patients to minimize the dose received by both cardiac devices and pacing leads. However, planning computed tomography (CT) scans have metal artifacts that degrade the image quality and make it diff… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 7 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among them, the Orthopaedics Metal Artifact Reduction (O-MAR, Philips Health System) and the iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR, Siemens Healthcare) algorithms were widely investigated for the improvement of radiation therapy planning [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Among the research-based MAR algorithms, Metal Deletion Technique (MDT, ReVision Radiology) [22] was the one most often compared to the commercially available algorithms [23][24][25][26]. All these algorithms typically suffer from improper restoration of HU values, from distortion of anatomical structures, and even from creation of secondary artifacts [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among them, the Orthopaedics Metal Artifact Reduction (O-MAR, Philips Health System) and the iterative Metal Artifact Reduction (iMAR, Siemens Healthcare) algorithms were widely investigated for the improvement of radiation therapy planning [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. Among the research-based MAR algorithms, Metal Deletion Technique (MDT, ReVision Radiology) [22] was the one most often compared to the commercially available algorithms [23][24][25][26]. All these algorithms typically suffer from improper restoration of HU values, from distortion of anatomical structures, and even from creation of secondary artifacts [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%