2006
DOI: 10.1897/06-138.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus, as a prey organism for toxicant exposure of fish through the diet

Abstract: The oligochaete, Lumbriculus variegatus, has several characteristics that make it desirable as a prey organism for conducting dietary exposure studies with fish. We conducted 21- and 30-d experiments with young fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) and rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss), respectively, to determine whether a diet consisting solely of L. variegatus would support normal growth and to compare performance with standard diets (Artemia nauplii, frozen brine shrimp, or trout chow). All diets were rea… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second approach involves spiking a test substance into food and then administering this contaminated diet to test organisms at a fixed ration, typically expressed as a fraction of the body wet weight per day, for a specified uptake period (Zitko and Hutzinger 1976; Zitko and Carson 1977; Zitko 1980; Bruggeman et al 1981; Muir and Yarechewski 1988; Opperhuizen and Schrap 1988; Schrap and Opperhuizen 1988; Clark and Mackay 1991; Fisk et al 1996, 1998; Dabrowska et al 1999; Martin et al 2003; Tomy et al 2007). A synthetic diet is typically used, but live prey organisms can also be first exposed to the test substance and then used as the dietary source of exposure (Mount et al 2006). A depuration phase is often included in which a subset of the exposed test animals are fed clean food and periodically sampled for chemical residues.…”
Section: Screening Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second approach involves spiking a test substance into food and then administering this contaminated diet to test organisms at a fixed ration, typically expressed as a fraction of the body wet weight per day, for a specified uptake period (Zitko and Hutzinger 1976; Zitko and Carson 1977; Zitko 1980; Bruggeman et al 1981; Muir and Yarechewski 1988; Opperhuizen and Schrap 1988; Schrap and Opperhuizen 1988; Clark and Mackay 1991; Fisk et al 1996, 1998; Dabrowska et al 1999; Martin et al 2003; Tomy et al 2007). A synthetic diet is typically used, but live prey organisms can also be first exposed to the test substance and then used as the dietary source of exposure (Mount et al 2006). A depuration phase is often included in which a subset of the exposed test animals are fed clean food and periodically sampled for chemical residues.…”
Section: Screening Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The THg detection limit of the outlined method is 0.005 μg g –1 w.w. of sample . After Hg quantification, wet weight Hg concentrations were converted to dry weight concentrations by dividing wet weight Hg concentrations by the proportion of total sample weight constituted by dry mass, estimated to be 0.2 for earthworms and 0.25 for fish muscle samples which have been frozen and thawed. These conversions enabled comparisons of dry weight Hg concentrations among all sample types.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The weight of the aliquots of worms were carried out by gently filtering them (−0,8 kPa, 60 s) on a pre-weighed polycarbonate filter (Nuclepore 3.0 µm, 47 mm i.d.) in order to remove the excess water [38].…”
Section: Test With Lumbriculus Variegatusmentioning
confidence: 99%