2016
DOI: 10.1597/14-174
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the On-Q Pain Pump in Alveolar Bone Grafting: Effect on Hospit Length of Stay

Abstract: Although there is a trend toward a shorter length of stay in our patients who received the On-Q pump, this finding was not statistically significant. Given the expense and additional burden of care associated with the device, we have become more selective in its utilization.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sbitany et al (2010) observed a significant decrease from 2.9 days to 1.4 days in the hospital with the use of a pain pump. However, the 2 other studies did not demonstrate a significant decrease with or without the use of the On-Q pain pump with durations of 0.52 and 0.37 days for 1 study and 1.09 and 1.12 days for the other (Meara et al, 2011; Muzaffar et al, 2016). Although the contributing factors are unclear, both of these reports had short hospitalizations associated without the use of a pain pump, which does not allow a significant decrease to be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Sbitany et al (2010) observed a significant decrease from 2.9 days to 1.4 days in the hospital with the use of a pain pump. However, the 2 other studies did not demonstrate a significant decrease with or without the use of the On-Q pain pump with durations of 0.52 and 0.37 days for 1 study and 1.09 and 1.12 days for the other (Meara et al, 2011; Muzaffar et al, 2016). Although the contributing factors are unclear, both of these reports had short hospitalizations associated without the use of a pain pump, which does not allow a significant decrease to be observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 86%
“…Secondary ABG with iliac crest bone is standard in many comprehensive cleft care protocols (Paterson et al, 2016), despite the fact that donor site pain remains a significant limitation (Rawashdeh, 2008; Meara et al, 2011; Myeroff and Archdeacon, 2011). Attempts to more effectively manage donor site pain have often been met with disappointing results (Wilkes and Thomas, 1994; Hahn et al, 1996; Morrison and Jacobs, 2003; Blumenthal et al, 2005; Singh et al, 2005; Morgan et al, 2006; Baig et al, 2006; Singh et al, 2007; Charous, 2008; Coulthard et al, 2008; Elder et al, 2008; Ouaki et al, 2009; Yoost et al, 2009; Sbitany et al, 2010; Sbitany et al, 2010; Meara et al, 2011; Visoiu, 2014; Muzaffar et al, 2016). Furthermore, alternatives to autologous bone have been explored to alleviate donor site morbidity, such as allograft and Bone Morphogentic Protein-2 (BMP-2) (Francis et al, 2013; Sivak et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations