“…The authors think that the reconstruction technique using the splenic artery with a superior mesenteric artery Carrel-patch ( Figure 1) has multiple advantages: 1) the caliber of the splenic artery is always bigger than the R/A-RHA, and it has always a good flow, especially in cirrhotic patients 8,24 ; thus a better flow arrives at its ostium and the anastomosis takes place with a bigger arterial caliber; 2) the use of superior mesenteric artery Carrel-patch allows an easier anastomosis without the need for branch caliber reduction; 3) when Carrel-patch is not used, the small caliber of the R/A-RHA creates a challenge for anastomosis because of the consequent disproportion with the caliber of the splenic artery; 4) in anatomical position, the celiac trunk turns posteriorly and the splenic artery is inferior and bottom-up in relation to the celiac trunk. After the aorta is divided and the celiac trunk is rectified, the splenic artery turns to the right, facing the accessory right hepatic branch, leading to a straight position after the anastomosis (Figure 2); 5) the length of the R/A-RHA is always sufficient to allow a short splenic stump anastomosis; 6) the anastomosis with the splenic artery leaves other options to perform the anastomosis at the recipient subject (aortal patch, celiac trunk, left gastric artery patch); 7) the celiac trunk remains in a straight position after the reconstruction to perform the recipient anastomosis; 8) only a short stump length is needed for the splenic artery and the superior mesenteric artery, which allows a simultaneous pancreas procurement because the inferior pancreatic arteries are at distances greater than 1cm from the R/A-RHA in most cases 7 .…”