2014
DOI: 10.1002/sres.2250
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the Structured Interview Matrix to Enhance Community Resilience Through Collaboration and Inclusive Engagement

Abstract: The EnRiCH Project was formed to address challenges with disaster management for high risk populations. The theoretical foundation is based on salutogenesis, systems theory and community resilience, with emphasis on community assets, social capital, citizen participation, and collaborative practice, which support adaptive capacity to respond and recover from adverse events. We present results from the process evaluation of the use of the structured interview matrix (SIM) facilitation technique as a first step … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0
4

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
43
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…As a method for qualitative research, it enables generation of rich data from a large sample of people (up to 40), while promoting inclusion and reducing power differentials. A process evaluation of this method by our team showed it enhances awareness and stimulates solution-oriented thinking among participants (O'Sullivan et al, 2015). All of these features of the SIM method align with principles of a CBPR approach (Israel, Eng, Schulz, & Parker, 2013).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 54%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As a method for qualitative research, it enables generation of rich data from a large sample of people (up to 40), while promoting inclusion and reducing power differentials. A process evaluation of this method by our team showed it enhances awareness and stimulates solution-oriented thinking among participants (O'Sullivan et al, 2015). All of these features of the SIM method align with principles of a CBPR approach (Israel, Eng, Schulz, & Parker, 2013).…”
Section: Data Collection and Analysismentioning
confidence: 54%
“…In doing so, individuals and organizations can more effectively use their assets in a sustainable way, compared with the deficits approach (McLean, 2011). This understanding and generation of creative solutions was experienced by participants in the EnRiCH intervention, who reported enhanced awareness and motivation to act after participating in a community asset-mapping intervention (O'Sullivan et al, 2015).…”
Section: Asset-based Approachmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As can be seen from Table 1, the Structured Interview Matrix (SIM) fulfills these requirements and, therefore, was selected to structure the discussions. The SIM sessions were conducted according to the methodology outlined in O'Sullivan and Kuziemsky [23] and O'Sullivan and Corneil [24]. Although this method has previously been used mostly for community asset mapping, in this study SIM was used as a technique to facilitate discussions between several groups of experts and to elicit knowledge from them.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simply calling for 'openness' within an organization does not make it so, particularly when subordinates feel psychologically unsafe in speaking their minds in the presence of their bosses (Bushe & Marshak, 2009). More recently, Bushe and Marshak (2015) identified 40 dialogic organizational development methods that help to create psychological safety and authentic dialogue, such as Open Space Technology (Owen, 2008), Interview Matrix (Harrison, 1999;Chartier, 2002;O'Sullivan, Corneil, Kuziemsky, & Toal-Sullivan, 2015), and World Café (Brown & Isaacs, 2005). In part, these approaches involve learning new ways to communicate, or 'think together,' including "suspending" one's initial reaction to what someone says, considering alternative explanations, and reflecting on one's own reactions, rather than blurting out knee-jerk response (Isaacs, 1999, p. 134-58).…”
Section: Dialogic Change and Inclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%