2000
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(05)73248-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of the word “scientific”

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2006
2006

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, claims to the firm rooting of biomedicine in scientific knowledge are widespread, as can be witnessed in the introductory chapters of clinical handbooks [see, for instance, Barker et al (1999); Isselbacher et al (1994); Kassirer & Kopelman (1991)], or in popular science books expressly dedicated to dispel any ideas that medicine might not be grounded in science [for example, Weatherall (1995)]. The abusive use of the word 'scientific' and the counterpart expression 'not scientific', however, has been noted at least by one author [Brewin (2000): 586], who wrote: 'Why not choose plainer words like abundant or scanty, convincing or unconvincing, objective or subjective? '…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Indeed, claims to the firm rooting of biomedicine in scientific knowledge are widespread, as can be witnessed in the introductory chapters of clinical handbooks [see, for instance, Barker et al (1999); Isselbacher et al (1994); Kassirer & Kopelman (1991)], or in popular science books expressly dedicated to dispel any ideas that medicine might not be grounded in science [for example, Weatherall (1995)]. The abusive use of the word 'scientific' and the counterpart expression 'not scientific', however, has been noted at least by one author [Brewin (2000): 586], who wrote: 'Why not choose plainer words like abundant or scanty, convincing or unconvincing, objective or subjective? '…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each of the z−derivatives were approximated by 2nd-order accurate centred finite differences. In solving the constraints we used the analytic value for R z with m = 1 at the throat while the value for R x at the throat was always set from the Hamiltonian constraint (1). Standard boundary conditions were applied, namely reflection symmetry at the throat and static conditions at the outer boundary.…”
Section: Constraint Equationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Far too often writers don't say in which sense they are using the word. 2 Even within the medical profession needless misunderstanding is caused. The doctor who says he wants medicine to be more scientific and the doctor who says he wants it to be less scientific, may sound as if they hold opposite views, but in fact they may both want the same things.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%