Use of topical haemostatic agents in cardiovascular surgery

Комаров, Р. Н.; Каравайкин, П. А.; Кузнецов, А. А.; Щербенев, В М; Бредихин, Р. А.; Gnevashev, A. S.; Юдин, А. Н.; Цеханович, В. Н.; Андреев, Д. Б.

doi:10.33529/angio2019118

Cited by 1 publication

(1 citation statement)

References 58 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…[1] Despite improvements in surgical suture techniques, arti cial blood vessel materials, and hemostatic agents, bleeding still occurs during surgery. [2][3][4][5] The reported rate of severe bleeding complicated by aortic surgery is 4.5%, with a mortality rate of 25.3%. [6] Aortic surgery bleeding can lead to prolonged chest closure time, ventilator duration, CCU stay, total hospitalization time, and increased hospital costs.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Is Cabrol fistula techniques really justified in surgical of aortic disease?

Han,

Ren,

et al. 2024

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: Cabrol fistulas are often used as a bailout procedure in cases of reoperation and severe calcifications in complex aneurysm surgery. However, the justification for using Cabrol fistulas in aortic dissection has been controversial. This study retrospectively evaluated the clinical outcomes of the prophylactic use of Cabrol fistulas. Methods: The design of this study was a retrospective study. We queried 414 patients with aortic aneurysms or type A aortic dissection who underwent emergency or selective aortic surgery at our center from January 2015 to December 2020 and were followed up until 2022. Among them, 280 patients were treated with the Cabrol fistula (Cabrol group), and 134 patients did not receive this technique (non-Cabrol group). The clinical data of all patients were retrospectively analyzed and followed up. Results: The 30-day mortality rate of the Cabrol group was higher than that of the non-Cabrol group (n = 29, 10.36% vs n = 7, 5.22%, p < 0.001). The Cabrol group had a lower drainage volume 3 days after surgery (1241 [IQR, 939-1638.5 ml] vs 1480 [IQR, 1245-1725 ml]). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications, BNP levels, CCU stay time, ventilation time, or reoperation (p > 0.05). These outcomes did not appear to differ in subgroup analysis for patients between the two groups. Conclusions: This study provides evidence that Cabrol fistulas can reduce postoperative drainage. However, patients who underwent Cabrol fistulas had increased 30-day mortality. The Cabrol technique can be used as an emergency measure for aortic surgical bleeding but cannot be used as a routine method.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%