“…As shown in previous studies, sonar (Fisher, Chowdhury, Khan, & Atamturktur, 2013;Topczewski, Cieśla, Mikołajewski, Adamski, & Markowski, 2016;Zheng, Xu, Cheng, Wang, & Lu, 2018), ground-penetrating radar (Burrell, Gurrola, & Mickus, 2008), radio frequency identification (Chapuis, Dufour, Provansal, Couvert, & De Linares, 2015), and accelerometer (Bao, Swartz, Vitton, Sun, Zhang, & Liu, 2017;Prendergast, Hester, Gavin, & O'sullivan, 2013) based measurement systems were frequently implemented for field scour measurements. Despite the primitive Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV)-based research technologies, which embodied river bathymetry modelling (Flener, 2013), risk assessment and flood analysis (Hackl, Adey, Woźniak, & Schümperlin, 2017;Jaud, Grasso, Le Dantec, Verney, Delacourt, Ammann, ... & Grandjean, 2016;Tamminga, Eaton, & Hugenholtz, 2015), other traditional methods were often used for scour measurements. Besides, as mentioned in previous researches, similar correlation was obtained between the bathymetric data acquired from high-resolution images in shallow water and the real values that were obtained from field surveys.…”