2008
DOI: 10.2514/1.32099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of Variable Incidence Angle for Glide Slope Control of Autonomous Parafoils

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
44
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent efforts by Ward and Costello [14,29] have also demonstrated the potential for improved glide-slope tracking through both online system identification, and by exploiting the longitudinal control coupling between incidence angle and symmetric brake deflection. To summarize, while the above approaches [14,[27][28][29] take some measures to account for the effect of wind uncertainty on the parafoil landing position, they offer no robustness to interaction with terrain obstacles, and are subject to the fundamental constraining of the solution space imposed by the glide-slope approach paradigm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent efforts by Ward and Costello [14,29] have also demonstrated the potential for improved glide-slope tracking through both online system identification, and by exploiting the longitudinal control coupling between incidence angle and symmetric brake deflection. To summarize, while the above approaches [14,[27][28][29] take some measures to account for the effect of wind uncertainty on the parafoil landing position, they offer no robustness to interaction with terrain obstacles, and are subject to the fundamental constraining of the solution space imposed by the glide-slope approach paradigm.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This makes the approach sensitive to uncertainty in both the vehicle dynamics and environment, especially given that the glide-slope surface shifts as a function of current wind conditions. Slegers et al 9 track the glide-slope using nonlinear model predictive control (MPC), improving rejection of small-scale disturbances, but still require long-term glide-slope tracking. Bergeron et al 10 use feedback control, known as glideslope guidance (GSG), to drive the goal approach based on the estimated glide-slope and wind conditions.…”
Section: Background and Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other approaches in the literature require an upper limit on the initial altitude for terminal guidance to remain computationally tractable 6,[8][9][10]12,13 . Figure 11 and Table 6 present simulation results on the valley terrain when the initial Figure 11.…”
Section: Viiid Cc-rrt Invariance To Initial Altitudementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Slegers et al [2] track the glide-slope using nonlinear model predictive control (MPC), improving rejection of small-scale disturbances, but also require long-term glide-slope tracking. Bergeron et al [3] use feedback control, known as glide-slope guidance (GSG), to drive the approach to the goal based on the estimated glide-slope and wind conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%