1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0378-1127(99)00034-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of vector analysis to determine the effects of harvest residues on early growth of second-rotation Sitka spruce

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…cycling was reported by Goulding and Stevens (1988), Fahey et al (1991), and by Proe et al (1999) for the Kielder site. According to Proe et al (1999), mineralization of logging residues does not make K ? easily available for tree uptake as it is leached immediately to deeper horizons or lost in ground and surface waters.…”
Section: Relationships Between Soil Status and Tree Nutritionsupporting
confidence: 57%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…cycling was reported by Goulding and Stevens (1988), Fahey et al (1991), and by Proe et al (1999) for the Kielder site. According to Proe et al (1999), mineralization of logging residues does not make K ? easily available for tree uptake as it is leached immediately to deeper horizons or lost in ground and surface waters.…”
Section: Relationships Between Soil Status and Tree Nutritionsupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Nutrient leaching from the litter layer after clearfelling of the first rotation Sitka spruce stands have been evaluated in the past (Malcolm and Titus 1983), and the nutrient changes in the peaty gley soils after the clearfelling of the Sitka spruce stands also assessed (Titus and Malcolm 1991). Growth reductions in Sitka spruce after 10 years following whole tree harvesting at these sites were reported by Proe and Dutch (1994) and tree nutrient status through foliar analysis was reported by Proe et al (1996Proe et al ( , 1999.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The foliar P concentrations in all treatments at age 10 years, however, were below the critical concentration of 0.093-0.11% suggested for slash pine (Xu et al, 1995a). The P:N ratio was also below the recommended ratio of 10% or more for most tree species (Proe et al, 1999). Foliar N concentration was marginal when compared to the recommended critical concentration of 0.90% for slash pine (Xu et al, 1995a).…”
Section: Foliar Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 57%
“…Except for P and N concentrations, foliar nutrient concentrations were above critical levels (K = 0.30%; Mg = 0.07%; and Ca = 0.12%) reported for the slash and Caribbean pines, the parent taxa of the F1 hybrid (Simpson and Osborne, 1993;Xu et al, 1995c). The element to N ratios (Table 2) were also above suggested critical levels for most tree species: K:N = 29-35%; Ca:N = 2.5% and Mg:N = 4% (Proe et al, 1999;Olsson et al, 2000;Moilanen et al, 2005). The foliar P concentrations in all treatments at age 10 years, however, were below the critical concentration of 0.093-0.11% suggested for slash pine (Xu et al, 1995a).…”
Section: Foliar Nutritionmentioning
confidence: 65%
See 1 more Smart Citation