Use of Vogel's Inflow Performance Relation for Coal Wells

Abstract

Introduction Deliverability of coal wells, like conventional gas wells, depends on bottomhole flowing pressure. Because coal wells often produce both gas and water, lowering bottomhole flowing pressure to increase gas rate also increases water rate. Thus, optimization of coal well profitability entails balancing gas revenues and water disposal costs. The present study was undertaken to determine if the relation between coal well bottomhole flowing pressure and gas and water production rates could be described by Vogel's Inflow Performance Relation (IPR). First, simulation studies were clone to test the applicability of Vogel's IPR to coal wells. Secondly, productivity of actual coal wells was compared with Vogel's IPR curves. Productivity of an oil well draining a solution-gas drive reservoir was investigated by Vogel using numerical simulation. A total of 21 simulations covering a wide range of oil, PVT properties, and relative permeabilities were made. By using dimensionless pressures and rates, Vogel found well productivity could be described by (1) where q is oil production rate in bpd, qmax is maximum oil production rate in bpd, pwf is bottomhole flowing pressure in psia, and pavg is average reservoir pressure in psia. Eq. (1), called Vogel's Inflow Performance Relation (IPR), was found to describe Simulated well productivity with a typical accuracy of 10%. Errors as high as 20% were noted for simulations of viscous crudes and/or damaged wells with skin factors great than +5. Over the last quarter century, Vogel's IPR curve has been extensively used to pi-edict oil well performance. Because of his success, the question arose as to whether Vogel's IPR could also describe gas and water production from a coal well. A more generalized Inflow Performance Relation was developed by Richardson and Shaw. Their equation (2) includes a variable Vogel coefficient, denoted as V. The Vogel coefficient, corresponding to the classic Vogel IPR is 0.2. Because of the unconventional nature of coalbed methane, it was speculated that the generalized method of Richardson and Shaw may describe coal well gas and water production more accurately than the Vogel IPR. Deliverability of a Warrior Basin coal well was discussed by Reeves et al. Backpressure of a Deerlick Creek well was sequentially decreased then increased, with the well being kept at each pressure for a week. Data obtained from the increasing bottomhole pressure steps fell substantially below that obtained from the decreasing bottomhole pressure steps. Reeves et al. attributed this behavior to the well not being stabilized. As shown by Mavor and Robinson, stabilization times of coal wells can be much longer than conventional gas wells with similar permeabilities and pressures clue to sorption compressibility. In the present study, care was taken in the field work to ensure wells were stabilized at a given pressure before moving to the next point. Simulation Studies Due to the expense of field tests, simulation was first used to investigate applicability of Vogel's IPR to coal wells. This study used Amoco's fully implicit, conventional reservoir simulator modified for coalbed methane simulation as described by Seidle and Arri. P. 641^

The inflow performance relationship in fractured, vertical, and dewatered coalbed-methane wells

“…Given the characteristics of CBM reservoirs, there are great differences between the IPRs of CBM wells and conventional wells (King, 1993). Nevertheless, the traditional IPR model can provide a reference for the IPR model of a CBM well (Seidle and Erickson, 1993). To accurately describe the IPR of a CBM well, among other matters, its gas-bearing properties, coal adsorbability, and the mechanical properties of the coal should all be considered.…”