2011
DOI: 10.1117/1.3554639
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Use of waveform lidar and hyperspectral sensors to assess selected spatial and structural patterns associated with recent and repeat disturbance and the abundance of sugar maple (<italic>Acer saccharum</italic> Marsh.) in a temperate mixed hardwood and conifer forest

Abstract: Waveform lidar imagery was acquired on September 26, 1999 over the Bartlett Experimental Forest (BEF) in New Hampshire (USA) using NASA's Laser Vegetation Imaging Sensor (LVIS). This flight occurred 20 months after an ice storm damaged millions of hectares of forestland in northeastern North America. Lidar measurements of the amplitude and intensity of ground energy returns appeared to readily detect areas of moderate to severe ice storm damage associated with the worst damage. Southern through eastern aspects… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maps derived from repeat lidar studies are of great value for calibrating, validating, and constraining a variety of models at the plot and landscape scale, including hydrological, geomorphological, vegetation, and habitat models. For example, erosion and deposition mapped and quantified by multitemporal lidar has provided unprecedented details into the fundamental processes that underlie Earth flow kinematics (Daehne and Corsini, 2014), riverbank and postfire erosion (Grove et al, 2013;Rengers et al, 2016), rockfall activity (Lim et al, 2005;Heckmann et al, 2012), precursors to rock slope failures (Rosser et al, 2007;Royán et al, 2015), carbon pools and fluxes (Dubayah et al, 2010;Goetz et al, 2011;Hudak et al, 2012, Liang et al, 2012Anderson et al, 2013;Meyer et al, 2013;Srinivasan et al, 2014;Hoffmeister et al, 2015;Cao et al, 2016;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2016), vegetation disturbance (Anderson et al, 2011;Dolan et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2013) and snow accumulation patterns (Veitinger et al, 2014).…”
Section: Multitemporal Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Maps derived from repeat lidar studies are of great value for calibrating, validating, and constraining a variety of models at the plot and landscape scale, including hydrological, geomorphological, vegetation, and habitat models. For example, erosion and deposition mapped and quantified by multitemporal lidar has provided unprecedented details into the fundamental processes that underlie Earth flow kinematics (Daehne and Corsini, 2014), riverbank and postfire erosion (Grove et al, 2013;Rengers et al, 2016), rockfall activity (Lim et al, 2005;Heckmann et al, 2012), precursors to rock slope failures (Rosser et al, 2007;Royán et al, 2015), carbon pools and fluxes (Dubayah et al, 2010;Goetz et al, 2011;Hudak et al, 2012, Liang et al, 2012Anderson et al, 2013;Meyer et al, 2013;Srinivasan et al, 2014;Hoffmeister et al, 2015;Cao et al, 2016;Réjou-Méchain et al, 2016), vegetation disturbance (Anderson et al, 2011;Dolan et al, 2011;Huang et al, 2013) and snow accumulation patterns (Veitinger et al, 2014).…”
Section: Multitemporal Lidarmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[3][4][5][6][7][8][9] The results of these studies have shown a clear trend in improving overall classification accuracies over singlesensor results. 3,8,9 Additionally, forest studies have moved from overall forest type mapping to tree species level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…5 In urban areas, more than two peaks can be found in the waveform backscattered by tree canopy as well as building edges. 11 Full waveform LiDAR is used for scanning and measurement in three different platforms: spaceborne, airborne, and terrestrial. 6 In order to model and fit the waveforms of raw LiDAR data, Gaussian function 7 or a mixture of several Gaussian distributions 8,9 were commonly used to fit the peak or peaks of a detected waveform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%