2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2004.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness and safety of percutaneous myocardial laser revascularization for refractory angina pectoris

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It was also reported that LV function may be compromised immediately after the procedure [51]. Five randomized clinical trials involving over 1,000 patients have since examined the safety and efficacy of percutaneous DMR, using the different available catheter systems, with mixed outcomes [6,[52][53][54][55]. Notably, the trials that were blinded failed to demonstrate any sustained treatment benefit [6,53,55].…”
Section: Direct Myocardial Laser Revascularizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…It was also reported that LV function may be compromised immediately after the procedure [51]. Five randomized clinical trials involving over 1,000 patients have since examined the safety and efficacy of percutaneous DMR, using the different available catheter systems, with mixed outcomes [6,[52][53][54][55]. Notably, the trials that were blinded failed to demonstrate any sustained treatment benefit [6,53,55].…”
Section: Direct Myocardial Laser Revascularizationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Also, in PACIFIC, diverse outcomes tended to be higher with laser therapy (924). Although the randomized, double-blind BELIEF trial (Blinded Evaluation of Laser PMR Intervention Electively For angina pectoris) of 82 patients appeared to show some benefit of percutaneous laser transmyocardial revascularization versus sham procedure on angina class and quality-of-life measures, the results were inconclusive given the small size of the study (925). To date, data are insufficient for FDA approval of percutaneous laser therapy.…”
Section: Society For Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventionsmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…Clinical staff performing the intervention were screened from the patients’ view 54 either by a surgical drape 52 or by arranging the operating room in a way that the patient could not see the procedure 44 . In the trial by Stone and colleagues, patients were heavily sedated and wore opaque goggles 30 .…”
Section: Strategies Used To Maintain Blinding In Interventional Placementioning
confidence: 99%