2001
DOI: 10.1053/ejso.2000.1096
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of 99m-Tc-sestamibi scintimammography in suspected breast cancer and in axillary lymph node metastases detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
6
1

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
6
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Such findings were different from those of Lumachi et al. They reported age did not affect the sensitivity of sestamibi scintimammography (16). There were five false‐negative cases in our study, four from the younger‐than‐50‐years group and one from the 50‐years‐or‐older group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Such findings were different from those of Lumachi et al. They reported age did not affect the sensitivity of sestamibi scintimammography (16). There were five false‐negative cases in our study, four from the younger‐than‐50‐years group and one from the 50‐years‐or‐older group.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 84%
“…Even though, there are posterior and recent publications with new results still reporting relatively good values [17,25-28]. Limachi et al [27] reported lower sensitivity if fewer nodes were affected, similar to our findings (in patients with <3 metastases, sensitivity was 69.7%, and only one out of six patients with a single lesion had a positive scan). See Table 3.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…A preoperative knowledge of node positivity is seen by some as an indication for neo-adjuvant chemotherapy. The imaging techniques that have been extensively investigated to assess the axilla preoperatively are US with a reported sensitivity of 56 -72% and a specificity of 70 -90% (Bruneton et al, 1986;de Freitas et al, 1991;Vaidya et al, 1996;Feu et al, 1997), scintimammography with a sensitivity of 67 -100% and a specificity of 80 -90% (Dupont et al, 2001;Lumachi et al, 2001), CT with a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 82% (March et al, 1991;Uematsu et al, 2001) and colour Doppler with a sensitivity of 76% (Yang et al, 2000(Yang et al, , 2001. The sensitivity and specificity achieved using these techniques does not allow a reliable selection of patients for full axillary clearance or a more minimally invasive procedure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%