1991
DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(91)90199-u
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Usefulness of echocardiography to differentiate dilated cardiomyopathy from coronary-induced congestive heart failure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
1

Year Published

1992
1992
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
14
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, large areas of scarring may also develop after myocarditis and mild to moderate regional dyssynergy is common in primary DCM. On the other hand, global left ventricular dysfunction occurs in patients with diffuse coronary disease (10). In the study of Vigna et al (11) the baseline hypocontractility tended to be less homogenous in patients with ischemic DCM than in those with nonischemic DCM, however large overlaps in the individual data were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, large areas of scarring may also develop after myocarditis and mild to moderate regional dyssynergy is common in primary DCM. On the other hand, global left ventricular dysfunction occurs in patients with diffuse coronary disease (10). In the study of Vigna et al (11) the baseline hypocontractility tended to be less homogenous in patients with ischemic DCM than in those with nonischemic DCM, however large overlaps in the individual data were observed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…Other noninvasive methods have been used to distinguish among ischemic and idiopathic cardiomyopathy, including echocardiography [15][16][17][18][19][20], radionuclide ventriculography [21,22], stress myocardial perfusion imaging [23][24][25][26], positron emission tomography [27,28] and electron beam computer tomography [29]. The success of these different approaches to distinguish between both etiologies of cardiomyopathy has been variable.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two-dimensional echocardiography, in combination with Doppler and color flow imaging, although commonly used by clinicians, has limited accuracy to differentiate patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy from those with ischemic cardiomyopathy. [27][28][29] Studies report that up to two-thirds of patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy may have regional wall motion abnormalities at rest. 27 Myocardial perfusion imaging is also limited in reliably differentiating ischemic from nonischemic cardiomyopathy, since many patients with the latter have radionuclide evidence of LV segmental wall motion abnormalities, selective LV systolic dysfunction, and segmental perfusion abnormalities.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%